chore: Add instructions regarding tool versions and env variables in Readme

[kylanhurt]

Description

The MetaMask Mobile Platform team has identified improvements to the read me as a way improving the developer experience and onboarding.

Related issues

Fixes: #8622 improves the effectiveness of the read me.

Manual testing steps

1. Read the repository Readme.md file

Screenshots/Recordings

Before:

8622-before.mov

After:

8622-after.mov

Pre-merge author checklist

• I’ve followed MetaMask Coding Standards.
• I've clearly explained what problem this PR is solving and how it is solved.
• I've linked related issues
• I've included manual testing steps
• I've included screenshots/recordings if applicable
• I’ve included tests if applicable
• I’ve documented my code using JSDoc format if applicable
• I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see labeling guidelines). Not required for external contributors.
• I’ve properly set the pull request status:
  • In case it's not yet "ready for review", I've set it to "draft".
  • In case it's "ready for review", I've changed it from "draft" to "non-draft".

Pre-merge reviewer checklist

• I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed).
• I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.

[github-actions]

CLA Signature Action: All authors have signed the CLA. You may need to manually re-run the blocking PR check if it doesn't pass in a few minutes.

[NicolasMassart]

Looks good to me.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 41.61%. Comparing base (6fe35ba) to head (ab2f122).

❗ Current head ab2f122 differs from pull request most recent head 80a3e6f. Consider uploading reports for the commit 80a3e6f to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8788   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   41.60%   41.61%           
=======================================
  Files        1269     1269           
  Lines       30859    30859           
  Branches     3082     3082           
=======================================
+ Hits        12840    12842    +2     
+ Misses      17243    17242    -1     
+ Partials      776      775    -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[kylanhurt]

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

[github-actions]

Bitrise

✅✅✅ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline passed on Bitrise! ✅✅✅

Commit hash: ef51376
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/8a1286ca-0381-47d5-9daf-46e549258b76

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

[Cal-L]

LGTM

Leaving another comment

[Cal-L]

Left a comment

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[Cal-L]

LGTM

[github-actions]

Bitrise

✅✅✅ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline passed on Bitrise! ✅✅✅

Commit hash: 348639c
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/74d509db-1334-4159-a9b0-5bed06832f08

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request