Skip to content

Update "Checked Iterators" topic #5498

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

Rageking8
Copy link
Contributor

  • Add backticks, simplify redundant relative links, format code examples, and update metadata

  • Remove  s that cause misalignment:

    With the  s removed:

Copy link
Contributor

@Rageking8 : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) and reviewer(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

Copy link
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit e019788:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
docs/standard-library/checked-iterators.md ✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

Copy link
Contributor

PRMerger Results

Issue Description
File Change Percent This PR contains file(s) with more than 30% file change.

@v-dirichards
Copy link
Contributor

@TylerMSFT

Can you review the proposed changes?

Important: When the changes are ready for publication, adding a #sign-off comment is the best way to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge.

#label:"aq-pr-triaged"
@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

@prmerger-automator prmerger-automator bot added the aq-pr-triaged Tracking label for the PR review team label Jul 7, 2025
@v-dirichards
Copy link
Contributor

@TylerMSFT Could you review this proposed update to your article and enter #sign-off in a comment if it's ready to merge?

Thanks!

@TylerMSFT
Copy link
Collaborator

#sign-off

@v-regandowner v-regandowner merged commit 0230370 into MicrosoftDocs:main Jul 25, 2025
2 checks passed
@Rageking8 Rageking8 deleted the update-checked-iterators-topic branch July 26, 2025 14:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants