Skip to content

Conversation

Rageking8
Copy link
Contributor

C26116, C26132, and C26133 are skipped to prevent potential merge conflicts with #5591 and #5714. A separate PR will be issued once those are merged.

This is batch 119 that structures error/warning references. See #5465 for more information.

Copy link
Contributor

@Rageking8 : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) and reviewer(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

Copy link
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit 1e38532:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
docs/code-quality/c26100.md ✅Succeeded
docs/code-quality/c26101.md ✅Succeeded
docs/code-quality/c26105.md ✅Succeeded
docs/code-quality/c26110.md ✅Succeeded
docs/code-quality/c26111.md ✅Succeeded
docs/code-quality/c26112.md ✅Succeeded
docs/code-quality/c26115.md ✅Succeeded
docs/code-quality/c26117.md ✅Succeeded
docs/code-quality/c26130.md ✅Succeeded
docs/code-quality/c26135.md ✅Succeeded
docs/code-quality/c26138.md ✅Succeeded
docs/code-quality/c26140.md ✅Succeeded
docs/code-quality/c26160.md ✅Succeeded
docs/code-quality/c26165.md ✅Succeeded
docs/code-quality/c26166.md ✅Succeeded
docs/code-quality/c26167.md ✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

Copy link
Contributor

PRMerger Results

Issue Description
Changed Files This PR contains more than 10 changed files.

@v-dirichards
Copy link
Contributor

@TylerMSFT

Can you review the proposed changes?

Editorial changes LGTM

Important: When the changes are ready for publication, adding a #sign-off comment is the best way to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge.

#label:"aq-pr-triaged"
@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

@prmerger-automator prmerger-automator bot added the aq-pr-triaged Tracking label for the PR review team label Sep 26, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR restructures warning documentation files for C++ code analysis warnings in the range C26100-C26167 to follow a consistent format structure. The changes standardize the YAML front matter by moving the title field to the second line and removing obsolete ms.assetid fields, while also adding "## Remarks" section headers where they were missing.

Key changes:

  • Restructured YAML front matter for consistency across warning documentation files
  • Added missing "## Remarks" section headers to provide better content organization
  • Removed obsolete ms.assetid metadata fields to clean up documentation structure

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 16 out of 16 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
c26100.md Updated YAML front matter structure and removed obsolete ms.assetid
c26101.md Restructured front matter and added "## Remarks" section header
c26105.md Updated YAML structure and added "## Remarks" section
c26110.md Restructured front matter and added "## Remarks" section header
c26111.md Updated YAML structure and added "## Remarks" section
c26112.md Restructured front matter and added "## Remarks" section header
c26115.md Updated YAML structure and added "## Remarks" section
c26117.md Restructured front matter and added "## Remarks" section header
c26130.md Updated YAML structure and added "## Remarks" section
c26135.md Restructured front matter and added "## Remarks" section header
c26138.md Updated YAML front matter structure only
c26140.md Restructured front matter and removed obsolete ms.assetid
c26160.md Updated YAML structure and added "## Remarks" section
c26165.md Restructured front matter and added "## Remarks" section header
c26166.md Updated YAML structure and added "## Remarks" section
c26167.md Restructured front matter and added "## Remarks" section header

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants