-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draw centering info on individual camera images #359
Comments
The level0 quicklooks have a circle drawn at the location of the photosphere based on the center found for the occulter.
|
@bberkeyU, below are examples of the gallery and normal quicklooks. I am going to get rid of the grey mask under the occulter for the normal quicklooks — do you want that for the gallery quicklooks also? Gallery quicklook: Normal level 0 quicklook: |
@bberkeyU is OK with the same as normal quicklooks. |
Thanks for making these. The data are still masked. You are applying a mask in the quicklook code so it is tough to determine if the green circle is located at the occulter edge. To verify the level 1 pipeline centers we could save unmasked 'level1' gifs from each camera with a circle drawn at the occulter, before you shift, rotate and combine the two cameras. That would provide the center found for the calibrated images. We can talk about that to make sure its worth it. |
Wow Mike! That was incredibly fast. The unmasked are much better for assessing the accuracy of the occulter size found by the code. I like your idea to use the masked scaling on the unmasked gif. That's the best of both worlds. Thanks so much! |
Full results are in |
I am not sure you can use level 2 polarization data to estimate the goodness of the radius. There is too much done to the level2 data. I would go back to Stoke I and do it for the two cameras separately. |
Giuliana: You make a good point. Mike measures the radius in the level 1 pB (after distortion, etc. ) Mike also saves the level 1 intensity image. He can measure the radius of the intensity mage along with the pB image for comparison Thanks very much for pointing that out. |
I have a test run in |
I was sending the same image into each GIF creation, so getting camera 0 image for both level 1 nomask GIFs. Also, need to put logic in for making the level 1 nomask GIFs at the same cadence as the regular nomask GIFs, not for every level 1 file. |
- Produce level 1 nomask images at the normal cadence in the eod - Use the distortion corrected radius - Use the correct camera 0 or 1 image for each GIF
The first nomask image (for each camera) is showing green in the saturated areas and annotations, as well as the occulter circle.
|
Mike. Please create cam0 and cam1 unmasked images (FITS/GIFs) with circles in the GIFs for these dates:
I need to look at the individual cameras with the circles for these dates to assess the changes in measured occulter radii that may indicate a platescale change. I will note this in ticket #367 where we are studying that issue. |
I forgot to mention that the test dates above are done, and the results are in |
Use 20210703 as test data.
Tasks
For quicklooks:
For level 2 UNMASKED GIFS (produced about every 20 minutes):
/FILL
option)For level 1 unmasked GIFs (produced about every 20 minutes):
Questions
level0/quicklooks
directory. Is this sufficient or should there be an option to produce annotated level 1 or 2 quicklooks? No, need specific changes from @jburkepile.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: