Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MOM6 configuration changes for compatibility with CICE6 B-grid #59

Closed
DeniseWorthen opened this issue Mar 3, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

Comments

@DeniseWorthen
Copy link
Collaborator

In the 1-deg MOM6 configuration, there is no land at the southern boundary (j=1). Since CICE6 obtains its land mask from the MOM6 configuration, CICE6 currently has no land at j=1 either.

MOM6 utilizes a C-grid while CICE6 utilizes the B-grid. During testing by the hygrid-godas team running the 1-deg configuration with the DATM, locations of very thick ice were seen developing in isolated single point locations.

Information provided by @apcraig addresses both these issues:

  1. The open boundary at j=1 is going to be problematic in the long term as the CICE6 ns_boundary_type='tripole' which means it's using "open" on the southern boundary.

  2. The thick ice seen in hybrid-godas configuration appear to be related to isolated ocean points. In other words, they are connected to only 1 other active gridcell. In pop, this was always a no-no because there could be no velocity in a gridcell that was isolated like that. I don't know what the restrictions are on MOM, but my guess is that the thick ice is related to this choice of masking. Because of the pop constraint, I don't have any experience running CICE with isolated cells like this. But the problem is that in a B-grid, you probably will not get any velocity at that cell.

@DeniseWorthen
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I'm going to close the issue here and reopen it on ufs-weather #445 since it should not involve any changes to MOM6 directly.

jiandewang pushed a commit to jiandewang/MOM6 that referenced this issue Jun 17, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant