Allow users to control iteration via the concept of iteration spaces.

docs/benchmarks.md

@@ -237,9 +237,37 @@ NVBENCH_BENCH_TYPES(benchmark, NVBENCH_TYPE_AXES(input_types, output_types))
 ```
 
 This would generate a total of 36 configurations and instantiate the benchmark 6
-times. Keep the rapid growth of these combinations in mind when choosing the
-number of values in an axis. See the section about combinatorial explosion for
-more examples and information.
+times.
+
+Keep the rapid growth of combinations due to multiple parameter axes in mind when
+choosing the number of values in an axis. See the section about combinatorial
+explosion for more examples and information.
+
+## Zipped Iteration of Value Axes
+
+At times multiple value axes need to be iterated like they are actually a tuple
+or zipped together. To enable this behavior you can request axes to be 'zipped'
+together.
+
+```cpp
+// InputTypes: {char, int, unsigned int}
+// OutputTypes: {float, double}
+// NumInputs: {1000, 10000, 100000, 200000, 200000, 200000}
+// Quality: {0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.}
+
+using input_types = nvbench::type_list<char, int, unsigned int>;
+using output_types = nvbench::type_list<float, double>;
+NVBENCH_BENCH_TYPES(benchmark, NVBENCH_TYPE_AXES(input_types, output_types))
+  .set_type_axes_names({"InputType", "OutputType"})
+  .add_int64_axis("NumInputs", {1000, 10000, 100000, 200000, 200000, 200000})
+  .add_float64_axis("Quality", {0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.})
+  .zip_axes({"NumInputs", "Quality"});
+```
+
+Zipping these two axes reduces the total combinations from 216 to 36, reducing the
+combinatorial explosion.
+
+Note: Only value axes may be zipped together.
 
 # Throughput Measurements
 
@@ -426,9 +454,9 @@ NVBENCH_BENCH_TYPES(my_benchmark,
 ```
 
 For large configuration spaces like this, pruning some of the less useful
-combinations (e.g. `sizeof(init_type) < sizeof(output)`) using the techniques
-described in the "Skip Uninteresting / Invalid Benchmarks" section can help
-immensely with keeping compile / run times manageable.
+combinations using the techniques described in the "Zipped/Tied Iteration of Value Axes"
+or "Skip Uninteresting / Invalid Benchmarks" section can help immensely with
+keeping compile / run times manageable.
 
 Splitting a single large configuration space into multiple, more focused
 benchmarks with reduced dimensionality will likely be worth the effort as well.

examples/CMakeLists.txt

@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ set(example_srcs
   stream.cu
   throughput.cu
   auto_throughput.cu
+  custom_iteration_spaces.cu
 )
 
 # Metatarget for all examples:

examples/custom_iteration_spaces.cu

@@ -0,0 +1,243 @@
+/*
+ *  Copyright 2021 NVIDIA Corporation
+ *
+ *  Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 with the LLVM exception
+ *  (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ *  the License.
+ *
+ *  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *      http://llvm.org/foundation/relicensing/LICENSE.txt
+ *
+ *  Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ *  distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ *  WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ *  See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ *  limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+#include <nvbench/nvbench.cuh>
+
+// Grab some testing kernels from NVBench:
+#include <nvbench/test_kernels.cuh>
+
+// Thrust vectors simplify memory management:
+#include <thrust/device_vector.h>
+
+#include <random>
+
+//==============================================================================
+// Multiple parameters:
+// Varies block_size and num_blocks while invoking a naive copy of 256 MiB worth
+// of int32_t.
+void copy_sweep_grid_shape(nvbench::state &state)
+{
+  // Get current parameters:
+  const int block_size = static_cast<int>(state.get_int64("BlockSize"));
+  const int num_blocks = static_cast<int>(state.get_int64("NumBlocks"));
+
+  // Number of int32s in 256 MiB:
+  const std::size_t num_values = 256 * 1024 * 1024 / sizeof(nvbench::int32_t);
+
+  // Report throughput stats:
+  state.add_element_count(num_values);
+  state.add_global_memory_reads<nvbench::int32_t>(num_values);
+  state.add_global_memory_writes<nvbench::int32_t>(num_values);
+
+  // Allocate device memory:
+  thrust::device_vector<nvbench::int32_t> in(num_values, 0);
+  thrust::device_vector<nvbench::int32_t> out(num_values, 0);
+
+  state.exec(
+    [block_size,
+     num_blocks,
+     num_values,
+     in_ptr  = thrust::raw_pointer_cast(in.data()),
+     out_ptr = thrust::raw_pointer_cast(out.data())](nvbench::launch &launch) {
+      nvbench::copy_kernel<<<num_blocks, block_size, 0, launch.get_stream()>>>(
+        in_ptr,
+        out_ptr,
+        num_values);
+    });
+}
+
+//==============================================================================
+// Naive iteration of both the BlockSize and NumBlocks axes.
+// Will generate the full cartesian product of the two axes for a total of
+// 16 invocations of copy_sweep_grid_shape.
+NVBENCH_BENCH(copy_sweep_grid_shape)
+  .set_name("naive_copy_sweep_grid_shape")
+  .add_int64_axis("BlockSize", {32, 64, 128, 256})
+  .add_int64_axis("NumBlocks", {1024, 512, 256, 128});
+
+//==============================================================================
+// Zipped iteration of BlockSize and NumBlocks axes.
+// Will generate only 4 invocations of copy_sweep_grid_shape
+NVBENCH_BENCH(copy_sweep_grid_shape)
+  .set_name("tied_copy_sweep_grid_shape")
+  .add_zip_axes(nvbench::int64_axis{"BlockSize", {32, 64, 128, 256}},
+                nvbench::int64_axis{"NumBlocks", {1024, 512, 256, 128}});
+
+//==============================================================================
+// under_diag:
+// Custom iterator that only searches the `X` locations of two axes:
+// [- - - - X]
+// [- - - X X]
+// [- - X X X]
+// [- X X X X]
+// [X X X X X]
+//
+struct under_diag final : nvbench::user_axis_space
+{
+  under_diag(std::vector<std::size_t> input_indices,
+             std::vector<std::size_t> output_indices)
+      : nvbench::user_axis_space(std::move(input_indices),
+                                 std::move(output_indices))
+  {}
+
+  mutable std::size_t x_pos   = 0;
+  mutable std::size_t y_pos   = 0;
+  mutable std::size_t x_start = 0;
+
+  nvbench::detail::axis_space_iterator do_get_iterator(axes_info info) const
+  {
+    // generate our increment function
+    auto adv_func = [&, info](std::size_t &inc_index,
+                              std::size_t /*len*/) -> bool {
+      inc_index++;
+      x_pos++;
+      if (x_pos == info[0].size)
+      {
+        x_pos = ++x_start;
+        y_pos = x_start;
+        return true;
+      }
+      return false;
+    };
+
+    // our update function
+    std::vector<std::size_t> locs = m_output_indices;
+    auto diag_under =
+      [&, locs, info](std::size_t,
+                      std::vector<nvbench::detail::axis_index> &indices) {
+        nvbench::detail::axis_index temp = info[0];
+        temp.index                       = x_pos;
+        indices[locs[0]]                 = temp;
+
+        temp             = info[1];
+        temp.index       = y_pos;
+        indices[locs[1]] = temp;
+      };
+
+    const size_t iteration_length = ((info[0].size * (info[1].size + 1)) / 2);
+    return nvbench::detail::make_space_iterator(2,
+                                                iteration_length,
+                                                adv_func,
+                                                diag_under);
+  }
+
+  std::size_t do_get_size(const axes_info &info) const
+  {
+    return ((info[0].size * (info[1].size + 1)) / 2);
+  }
+
+  std::size_t do_get_active_count(const axes_info &info) const
+  {
+    return ((info[0].size * (info[1].size + 1)) / 2);
+  }
+
+  std::unique_ptr<nvbench::iteration_space_base> do_clone() const
+  {
+    return std::make_unique<under_diag>(*this);
+  }
+};
+
+NVBENCH_BENCH(copy_sweep_grid_shape)
+  .set_name("user_copy_sweep_grid_shape")
+  .add_user_iteration_axes(
+    [](auto... args) -> std::unique_ptr<nvbench::iteration_space_base> {
+      return std::make_unique<under_diag>(args...);
+    },
+    nvbench::int64_axis("BlockSize", {64, 128, 256, 512, 1024}),
+    nvbench::int64_axis("NumBlocks", {1024, 521, 256, 128, 64}));
+
+//==============================================================================
+// gauss:
+// Custom iteration space that uses a gauss distribution to
+// sample the points near the middle of the index space
+//
+struct gauss final : nvbench::user_axis_space
+{
+
+  gauss(std::vector<std::size_t> input_indices,
+        std::vector<std::size_t> output_indices)
+      : nvbench::user_axis_space(std::move(input_indices),
+                                 std::move(output_indices))
+  {}
+
+  nvbench::detail::axis_space_iterator do_get_iterator(axes_info info) const
+  {
+    const double mid_point = static_cast<double>((info[0].size / 2));
+
+    std::random_device rd{};
+    std::mt19937 gen{rd()};
+    std::normal_distribution<> d{mid_point, 2};
+
+    const size_t iteration_length = info[0].size;
+    std::vector<std::size_t> gauss_indices(iteration_length);
+    for (auto &g : gauss_indices)
+    {
+      auto v = std::min(static_cast<double>(info[0].size), d(gen));
+      v      = std::max(0.0, v);
+      g      = static_cast<std::size_t>(v);
+    }
+
+    // our update function
+    std::vector<std::size_t> locs = m_output_indices;
+    auto gauss_func               = [=](std::size_t index,
+                          std::vector<nvbench::detail::axis_index> &indices) {
+      nvbench::detail::axis_index temp = info[0];
+      temp.index                       = gauss_indices[index];
+      indices[locs[0]]                 = temp;
+    };
+
+    return nvbench::detail::make_space_iterator(1,
+                                                iteration_length,
+                                                gauss_func);
+  }
+
+  std::size_t do_get_size(const axes_info &info) const { return info[0].size; }
+
+  std::size_t do_get_active_count(const axes_info &info) const
+  {
+    return info[0].size;
+  }
+
+  std::unique_ptr<iteration_space_base> do_clone() const
+  {
+    return std::make_unique<gauss>(*this);
+  }
+};
+//==============================================================================
+// Dual parameter sweep:
+void dual_float64_axis(nvbench::state &state)
+{
+  const auto duration_A = state.get_float64("Duration_A");
+  const auto duration_B = state.get_float64("Duration_B");
+
+  state.exec([duration_A, duration_B](nvbench::launch &launch) {
+    nvbench::sleep_kernel<<<1, 1, 0, launch.get_stream()>>>(duration_A +
+                                                            duration_B);
+  });
+}
+NVBENCH_BENCH(dual_float64_axis)
+  .add_user_iteration_axes(
+    [](auto... args) -> std::unique_ptr<nvbench::iteration_space_base> {
+      return std::make_unique<gauss>(args...);
+    },
+    nvbench::float64_axis("Duration_A", nvbench::range(0., 1e-4, 1e-5)))
+  .add_user_iteration_axes(
+    [](auto... args) -> std::unique_ptr<nvbench::iteration_space_base> {
+      return std::make_unique<gauss>(args...);
+    },
+    nvbench::float64_axis("Duration_B", nvbench::range(0., 1e-4, 1e-5)));

nvbench/CMakeLists.txt

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 set(srcs
   axes_metadata.cxx
   axis_base.cxx
+  iteration_space_base.cxx
   benchmark_base.cxx
   benchmark_manager.cxx
   blocking_kernel.cu
@@ -10,6 +11,7 @@ set(srcs
   device_manager.cu
   float64_axis.cxx
   int64_axis.cxx
+  linear_axis_space.cxx
   markdown_printer.cu
   named_values.cxx
   option_parser.cu
@@ -20,6 +22,8 @@ set(srcs
   string_axis.cxx
   type_axis.cxx
   type_strings.cxx
+  user_axis_space.cxx
+  zip_axis_space.cxx
 
   detail/measure_cold.cu
   detail/measure_hot.cu