Missing support for array conversion

[hazaart]

In case a node exists multiple time in the same parent, it will automatically be converted to a JS array.
If the node occurs only once however in the dataset (eventhough it could occur multiple times in theory), the conversion will create an object cause it has no way of knowing it should convert it to an array.
Other libraries have support for this by adding an array in the parsing options containing a list of elements that always need to be converted to an array.
Example https://github.com/abdolence/x2js has support via 'arrayAccessFormPaths'.

I am surprised this basic conceptual issue in xml to json conversion is not yet covered by this widely used library. Makes for a lot of painful checks on the output.

[amitguptagwl]

I am surprised this basic conceptual issue in xml to json conversion is not yet covered by this widely used library. Makes for a lot of painful checks on the output.

😄 Have you checked for the already raised issues and the discussion on the same topic?

Please give us an example so we can understand if your rasied concern is different.

[hazaart]

Hi,

It is the same as issue #166
But it should be supported in the library.
If you allow to pass an optional array which specifies which nodenames should always convert to Array.
See example implementation as mentioned above in x2js.

Being a conceptual issue when making a conversion from XML to JSON, I think it would be nice if a solution is supported by the library.

Thanks

[amitguptagwl]

There is no standard for XML to JSON/JS Object conversion. Hence, we need to finalize the response which suits to our implementation and users expectation. People feel its need but no one yet given us the clear requirement.

We don't want hurry. Because many changes cant be reverted once the users at world level start using them.

[amitguptagwl]

I'm closing this issue as it is duplicate for the other issue. If you'll feel we should keep it open, please reopen

[hazaart]

"People feel its need but no one yet given us the clear requirement."
How do you mean, I just did :-)

In the options we can pass for parsing, add a new optional array. This way there is no conflict with the existing way of working.

arrayAccessFormPaths : [] - Array access paths - use this option to configure paths to XML elements always in "array form". You can configure beforehand paths to all your array elements based on XSD or your knowledge. Every path could be a simple string (like 'parent.child1.child2'), a regex (like /.*.child2/), or a custom function. Default is empty

[amitguptagwl]

This is not a clear requirement. I doubt if you have seen the previous discussions.

[DazChong]

Yes, this is a missing feature.
Imaging scenario of user object with multiple emails as array, some user have multiple emails and some only have 1.

[amitguptagwl]

@hazaart @DazChong FYR #135

[Kaarel]

Use cases:
Invoices, stock inventory, accounting, shopping carts, travel reservations, players in a game etc etc. They all have 0 to n items, in practice 1 to n. Basically almost every use case :) 1 is just a special case of n element array.

We have a lot of use cases like below. We do not control the XML that is sent to us, we just need to work with it.

<report>
    <store>
        <region>US</region>
        <inventory>
            <item>
                <name>Banana</name>
                <count>200</count>
            </item>
            <item>
                <name>Apple</name>
                <count>100</count>
            </item>
        </inventory>
    </store>
    <store>
        <region>EU</region>
        <inventory>
            <item>
                <name>Banana</name>
                <count>100</count>
            </item>
        </inventory>
    </store>
</report>

which fast-xml-parser parses into

{
  "report": {
    "store": [
      {
        "region": "US",
        "inventory": {
          "item": [
            {
              "name": "Banana",
              "count": "200"
            },
            {
              "name": "Apple",
              "count": "100"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      {
        "region": "EU",
        "inventory": {
          "item": {
            "name": "Banana",
            "count": "100"
          }
        }
      }
    ]
  }
}

Note that the type of store.inventory.item changes! Without this feature accessing inventory items for every store requires always testing if store.inventory.item is array or not. Same for iterating over stores as well, as the report could contain just one store. In practice there are a lot more elements like that in the XML we parse. This results in an unnecessarily complicated application code.

Basically this is the reason we can not use fast-xml-parser.

[amitguptagwl]

Thanks for highlighting this @Kaarel . So if let's suppose, we have some option which basically renders a nested tag always an array, it'll look like as follow;

{
    "report": [
        {
            "store": [
                {
                    "region": "US",
                    "inventory": [
                        {
                            "item": [
                                {
                                    "name": "Banana",
                                    "count": "200"
                                },
                                {
                                    "name": "Apple",
                                    "count": "100"
                                }
                            ]
                        }
                    ]
                },
                {
                    "region": "EU",
                    "inventory": [
                        {
                            "item": [
                                {
                                    "name": "Banana",
                                    "count": "100"
                                }
                            ]
                        }
                    ]
                }
            ]
        }
    ]
}

will it solve the purpose?

[amitguptagwl]

I have started the discussion here;

#190

[Kaarel]

Yes, specifically the strict mode in the examples of #190

[gknapp]

I'm using openlayers, it expects single values be a collection (array) and not unwrapped (object). It checks the parent node length but fails when the single value is unwrapped. Having a configuration option for this would mean I could use fast-xml-parser.