Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

influxdb: parametrize default.nix to prepare packaging of 1.0 #17161

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 22, 2016

Conversation

cko
Copy link
Member

@cko cko commented Jul 21, 2016

Motivation for this change

Parametrize default.nix as preparation for adding a package for 1.0.0-beta3

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing
    (nix.useChroot on NixOS,
    or option build-use-chroot in nix.conf
    on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • OS X
    • Linux
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@mention-bot
Copy link

@cko, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the annotation information on this pull request, we identified @zimbatm, @offlinehacker and @kamilchm to be potential reviewers

@grahamc
Copy link
Member

grahamc commented Jul 21, 2016

With such a short build expression (where most of it is generated anyway), what is the value of parameterization?


Review status: 0 of 3 files reviewed at latest revision, all discussions resolved.


Comments from Reviewable

@cko
Copy link
Member Author

cko commented Jul 21, 2016

I would like to add an additional package for for 1.0.0-beta3 and keep duplications as little as possible.

@cko
Copy link
Member Author

cko commented Jul 22, 2016

Build error is fixed with f8ea8c7 . Could someone retrigger the Travis Job?

@garbas garbas merged commit f6d7a56 into NixOS:master Jul 22, 2016
cko added a commit to cko/nixpkgs that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants