Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

lilypond: 2.24.3 -> 2.24.4 #329816

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 2, 2024
Merged

Conversation

r-ryantm
Copy link
Contributor

Automatic update generated by nixpkgs-update tools. This update was made based on information from passthru.updateScript.

meta.description for lilypond is: Music typesetting system

meta.homepage for lilypond is: http://lilypond.org/

Updates performed
  • Ran passthru.UpdateScript
To inspect upstream changes
Impact

Checks done


  • built on NixOS
  • The tests defined in passthru.tests, if any, passed
  • found 2.24.4 with grep in /nix/store/a0lszdqikp0nwxp1iq0b2ix4s6df4g8g-lilypond-2.24.4
  • found 2.24.4 in filename of file in /nix/store/a0lszdqikp0nwxp1iq0b2ix4s6df4g8g-lilypond-2.24.4

Rebuild report (if merged into master) (click to expand)
18 total rebuild path(s)

18 package rebuild(s)

First fifty rebuilds by attrpath

asciidoc-full
asciidoc-full-with-plugins
clevis
denemo
disorderfs
kakounePlugins.rep
lenmus
lilypond
lilypond-with-fonts
luksmeta
python311Packages.abjad
python312Packages.abjad
rep
solfege
spring
springLobby
tang
Instructions to test this update (click to expand)

Either download from Cachix:

nix-store -r /nix/store/a0lszdqikp0nwxp1iq0b2ix4s6df4g8g-lilypond-2.24.4 \
  --option binary-caches 'https://cache.nixos.org/ https://nix-community.cachix.org/' \
  --option trusted-public-keys '
  nix-community.cachix.org-1:mB9FSh9qf2dCimDSUo8Zy7bkq5CX+/rkCWyvRCYg3Fs=
  cache.nixos.org-1:6NCHdD59X431o0gWypbMrAURkbJ16ZPMQFGspcDShjY=
  '

(The Cachix cache is only trusted for this store-path realization.)
For the Cachix download to work, your user must be in the trusted-users list or you can use sudo since root is effectively trusted.

Or, build yourself:

nix-build -A lilypond https://github.com/r-ryantm/nixpkgs/archive/eaaf0eba0b6f6687c79b6c6ba289999740968fe7.tar.gz

Or:

nix build github:r-ryantm/nixpkgs/eaaf0eba0b6f6687c79b6c6ba289999740968fe7#lilypond

After you've downloaded or built it, look at the files and if there are any, run the binaries:

ls -la /nix/store/a0lszdqikp0nwxp1iq0b2ix4s6df4g8g-lilypond-2.24.4
ls -la /nix/store/a0lszdqikp0nwxp1iq0b2ix4s6df4g8g-lilypond-2.24.4/bin


Pre-merge build results

We have automatically built all packages that will get rebuilt due to
this change.

This gives evidence on whether the upgrade will break dependent packages.
Note sometimes packages show up as failed to build independent of the
change, simply because they are already broken on the target branch.

Result of nixpkgs-review run on x86_64-linux 1

2 packages marked as broken and skipped:
  • spring
  • springLobby
2 packages failed to build:
  • python312Packages.abjad
  • python312Packages.abjad.dist
18 packages built:
  • asciidoc-full
  • asciidoc-full-with-plugins
  • asciidoc-full-with-plugins.dist
  • asciidoc-full.dist
  • clevis
  • clevis.man
  • denemo
  • disorderfs
  • kakounePlugins.rep
  • lenmus
  • lilypond
  • lilypond-with-fonts
  • luksmeta
  • python311Packages.abjad
  • python311Packages.abjad.dist
  • solfege
  • tang
  • tang.man

Maintainer pings

cc @MarcWeber @yurrriq for testing.

Copy link
Contributor

@mattpolzin mattpolzin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 329816 run on x86_64-linux 1

2 packages marked as broken and skipped:
  • spring
  • springLobby
2 packages failed to build:
  • python312Packages.abjad
  • python312Packages.abjad.dist
18 packages built:
  • asciidoc-full
  • asciidoc-full-with-plugins
  • asciidoc-full-with-plugins.dist
  • asciidoc-full.dist
  • clevis
  • clevis.man
  • denemo
  • disorderfs
  • rep (kakounePlugins.rep)
  • lenmus
  • lilypond
  • lilypond-with-fonts
  • luksmeta
  • python311Packages.abjad
  • python311Packages.abjad.dist
  • solfege
  • tang
  • tang.man

python312Packages.abjad fails to build on master as well. In fact, the version currently on master appears to quite explicitly not support Python 3.12. That's not relevant to this PR, though.

This is Abjad 3.19, which supports Python 3.10, 3.11.

Copy link
Contributor

@mattpolzin mattpolzin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 329816 run on x86_64-darwin 1

4 packages failed to build:
  • asciidoc-full-with-plugins
  • asciidoc-full-with-plugins.dist
  • python312Packages.abjad
  • python312Packages.abjad.dist
8 packages built:
  • asciidoc-full
  • asciidoc-full.dist
  • rep (kakounePlugins.rep)
  • lenmus
  • lilypond
  • lilypond-with-fonts
  • python311Packages.abjad
  • python311Packages.abjad.dist

asciidoc-full-with-plugins and python312Packages.abjad both fail to build on master already. The former is 1 test failure that I have not looked into further (but it is not related to this PR at any rate). I've opened a PR to fix the latter though again that is inconsequential to this PR.

@tomberek
Copy link
Contributor

tomberek commented Aug 2, 2024

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 329816 run on x86_64-linux 1

4 packages marked as broken and skipped:
  • python312Packages.abjad
  • python312Packages.abjad.dist
  • spring
  • springLobby
18 packages built:
  • asciidoc-full
  • asciidoc-full-with-plugins
  • asciidoc-full-with-plugins.dist
  • asciidoc-full.dist
  • clevis
  • clevis.man
  • denemo
  • disorderfs
  • rep (kakounePlugins.rep)
  • lenmus
  • lilypond
  • lilypond-with-fonts
  • luksmeta
  • python311Packages.abjad
  • python311Packages.abjad.dist
  • solfege
  • tang
  • tang.man

@tomberek tomberek merged commit 222fc10 into NixOS:master Aug 2, 2024
29 checks passed
@r-ryantm r-ryantm deleted the auto-update/lilypond branch August 2, 2024 12:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants