Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

nixpkgs doc: add format Make target #39786

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 1, 2018

Conversation

grahamc
Copy link
Member

@grahamc grahamc commented May 1, 2018

Motivation for this change

Now, running make from within the nix-shell will auto-format the Nixpkgs docs.

See #39700 for the results. When this merges, I'll run the makefile and commit the results. Until then, it isn't worth doing.

# DocBook Configuration file for "xmlformat"
# see http://www.kitebird.com/software/xmlformat/
# 10 Sept. 2004
#
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sourced from openSUSE/daps#454

@grahamc
Copy link
Member Author

grahamc commented May 1, 2018

Updated to contain a format target for the nixos docs.

I'll merge soon, then push the reformatted docs.

@GrahamcOfBorg GrahamcOfBorg added 6.topic: nixos Issues or PRs affecting NixOS modules, or package usability issues specific to NixOS 8.has: documentation 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild labels May 1, 2018
@grahamc grahamc merged commit 4f5a995 into NixOS:master May 1, 2018
@grahamc grahamc deleted the format-nixpkgs-docs-target branch May 1, 2018 23:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
6.topic: nixos Issues or PRs affecting NixOS modules, or package usability issues specific to NixOS 8.has: documentation 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants