-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
openafs_1_8: Init at 1.8.0 (was: openafs: 1.6.22.3 -> 1.8.0) #41889
Conversation
@GrahamcOfBorg build linuxPackages.openafs |
No attempt on x86_64-darwin (full log) The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on x86_64-darwin: linuxPackages.openafs Partial log (click to expand)
|
Failure on aarch64-linux (full log) Attempted: linuxPackages.openafs Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on x86_64-linux (full log) Attempted: linuxPackages.openafs Partial log (click to expand)
|
According to Hydra logs this never built on aarch64, although upstream seems to support ARM. Please mark the package as broken on aarch64: |
03e4946
to
c5504ed
Compare
@GrahamcOfBorg build linuxPackages.openafs ... looks like I don't have the mojo... |
@GrahamcOfBorg build linuxPackages.openafs |
No attempt on x86_64-darwin (full log) The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on x86_64-darwin: linuxPackages.openafs Partial log (click to expand)
|
Failure on aarch64-linux (full log) Attempted: linuxPackages.openafs Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on x86_64-linux (full log) Attempted: linuxPackages.openafs Partial log (click to expand)
|
still broken on aarch64 |
76a927e
to
66334ba
Compare
I changed the direction of this PR. The packages openafs and openafs_1_8 are both maintained for a while to allow for a smooth transition (especially for servers) from OpenAFS 1.6 to 1.8. I introduced nixos options for package selection to further smoothen the transition. |
66334ba
to
d87217e
Compare
I just noticed a bug in the new openafs release. Please don't merge, yet. |
- Introduce new "server" output holding the server binaries - Adapt tsmbac.patch to new build environment - Adapt openafs nixos server module accordingly - Update upstream CellServDB: 2017-03-14 -> 2018-05-14 - Introduce package attributes to refer to the openafs packages to use for server, programs and kernel module
d87217e
to
35ebd3f
Compare
The bug is fixed. PR is ready to be merged. |
@GrahamcOfBorg build linuxPackages.openafs_1_8 |
No attempt on x86_64-darwin (full log) The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on x86_64-darwin: linuxPackages.openafs_1_8 Partial log (click to expand)
|
No attempt on aarch64-linux (full log) The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on aarch64-linux: linuxPackages.openafs_1_8 Partial log (click to expand)
|
@GrahamcOfBorg build openafs_1_8 |
No attempt on x86_64-darwin (full log) The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on x86_64-darwin: openafs_1_8 Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on x86_64-linux (full log) Attempted: linuxPackages.openafs_1_8 Partial log (click to expand)
|
Failure on aarch64-linux (full log) Attempted: openafs_1_8 Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on x86_64-linux (full log) Attempted: openafs_1_8 Partial log (click to expand)
|
Motivation for this change
Update to new stable release.
Things done
sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS)./result/bin/
)