You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
> db.objects.find({_key:"message:31828"}).pretty();
{
"_id" : ObjectId("554538022b1e9e3c288fe490"),
"_key" : "message:31828",
"touid" : 4576,
"fromuid" : 4108,
"timestamp" : 1428858291159,
"content" : "\nNotebookcheck\n \n\n The Start\n Laptops\n Accessories\n Games\n News\n Rankings\n Forum\n Deals\n Partners\n Event\n Search reviews\n search\n \n\ntests and reviews laptops - Polish edition - laptop> Laptops> Review Dell Inspiron 15 7548\nThe offer Xtreem and mobilQ recommend\n\n Clevo N150SD, N170SD\n Clevo P150SM-A, P170SM-A\n Clevo P375SM-A, P377SM-A\n Clevo P651, P670\n Clevo P751ZM, P771ZM\n Clevo W230SD\n Dell Latitude 3340, 3440, 3540\n Dell Latitude E7240, E7440\n HP EliteBook 820, 840, 850\n HP ProBook 430, 450, 470, 640, 650\n HP ZBook 14, 15, 17\n Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E440, E540\n Lenovo ThinkPad L440, L540\n Lenovo ThinkPad T440p, T450, T450s, T540p\n Lenovo Y50-70, Z50-70\n MSI GE60, GE62, GE70, GE72\n MSI GS60, GS70\n MSI GT72, GT80\n Toshiba Portégé R30-A-A Z30, Z30-B\n Toshiba Tecra Z50-A\n\nTest your laptop Dell Inspiron 15 7548\n\nText and photos: Sascha Molck\nTranslation and introduction: Thomas Cyba\n\n11/04/2015\nInspiron 7548 is part of the 7000 series, which is the most expensive Inspironów. Therefore, has, among others, a large part of the aluminum casing. Unfortunately, he received a weaker graphics card than its predecessor. Selecting a 4K sensor (such was the UUT) is also misguided decision.\nDell Inspiron 15-7548\nProcessor\nIntel 2.4GHz Core i7-5500U\nGraphics Card\nAMD Radeon R7 M270 - 4096 MB, the core: 725-825 MHz, the memory 900 MHz, DDR3, Omega Catalyst 14.12 (14.501.1003.0), Enduro\nMemory\n16384 MB\n, DDR3-1600 Dual-Channel, two slots\nMatrix\n15.6-inch 16: 9, 3840x2160 pixels, kapazitiv, 10-Punkte-Multitouch, Samsung, IPS, refleksująca: yes\nChipset\nBroadwell-U Intel PCH-LP (Premium)\nHard drive\nIT Liteon LCS-256L9S-11, 256 GB\n200 GB of free space\nWeight\n2.1 kg Power Supply: 343 g\nThe Price\n- PLN\nsee all specifications\n\n \nLaptops with Nvidia graphics cards Maxwell\n\nlaptops with GeForce 830M\nlaptops with GeForce 840M\nlaptops with GeForce 930m\nlaptops with GeForce GTX 850M\nlaptops with GeForce GTX 860m\nlaptops with GeForce GTX 965M\nlaptops with GeForce GTX 970m\nlaptops with GeForce GTX 980m\nHousing\n\nHousing Inspiron 7548 is only about 2.3 mm thinner than its predecessor housing, ie Inspiron 7537th Through proper profiling of the front part of the side walls seems to be much slimmer than the older design. Compared to its predecessor, the hero of this review has lost a good half pound of weight. Did not change the materials of construction. Almost all of the housing (with the exception of the bottom of the fundamental unit) is made of aluminum. Modified while coloring. Inspiron 7537 was the silver, while in 7548 Inspironie are silver lid and the bottom of the body. The top of the host unit is dark (anthracite).\n\nAs for the quality, there were no deficiencies. The housing also falls well in terms of stiffness. The body deflects slightly under the pressure only in the middle of the left edge. Base unit withstands attempts to buckling. Screen lid can skew a little while. Emphasis on the lid does not cause disturbances in the displayed image.\n\nHinges go relatively hard.\nLaptops with Nvidia Kepler graphics cards\n\nlaptops with GeForce GT 735M\nlaptops with GeForce GT 740m\nlaptops with GeForce GT 750M\nlaptops with GeForce GT 755M\nlaptops with GeForce GTX 760M\nlaptops with GeForce GTX 765M\nlaptops with GeForce GTX 770M\nlaptops with GeForce GTX 780m\nlaptops with GeForce GTX 870M\nlaptops with GeForce GTX 880M\n\nInspiron 7548 does not have a separate service cover, but access to the components and it is so easy. After unscrewing all the screws you just take off the bottom of the host unit. The current laptop has two memory slots of RAM (in the tested both were occupied by units with a capacity of 8 GB). SATA 2.5 \"can be replaced with a different height of 7 mm. It is possible to clean both fans. In the event of failure of the battery can be replaced (which is attached a few screws).\n\nSlim design forced to restrict ourselves to the basic external connectors. The current laptop does not have such. LAN socket. Two of the three USB ports are compatible with USB 3.0. All connectors are located in the rear parts of the sidewalls.\nLeft Side: Power jack, HDMI, USB 3.0, slot audiolewy side: power, HDMI, USB 3.0, audio jack\nRight: card reader, USB 3.0, USB 2.0 cable slot zabezpieczającejprawy side: memory card reader, USB 3.0, USB 2.0 cable lock slot\nLaptops with Intel Haswell Manufacturer\n\nAcer\nApple\nAsus\nDell\nFujitsu\nHP\nLenovo\nMSI\nSony\nToshiba\nEquipment\n\nInspiron 7537 had a keyboard with separate numeric keypad, while in 7548 Inspironie abandoned this additional part of the keyboard. The keyboard has a two-stage illumination. Alphanumeric keys measure about 14 x 14 mm. The keys have a short stroke and a distinct stop. The resistance when pressed they should be a little bigger.\n\nThe touchpad is a ClickPad, which is a solution with integrated buttons (for a few pushes the entire plate). Its dimensions are approximately 8 x 10.5 cm. It provides enough space to use the multi-touch feature. Its surface is slightly rough. Jump a push plate is short.\n\nOne of the controls is also a touch screen, this laptop it responds to commands immediately.\nQWERTZ keyboard QWERTZklawiatura\ndotykowapłytka plate Touch\nLaptops with Intel Ivy Bridge\n\nall brands\nThe Painting\n\nDelivered to the test specimen had a matrix 15.6 \"4K (3840 x 2160 pixels.) There is also a Full HD display. High resolution matrix in this laptop is scaling problems in some applications.\n219\ncd / m² 212\ncd / m² 201\ncd / m²\n228\ncd / m² 214\ncd / m² 202\ncd / m²\n203\ncd / m² 184\ncd / m² 176\ncd / m²\nbacklight\nParameters\nX-Rite i1Pro 2\na maximum of 228 cd / m²\nAverage: 204.3 cd / m²\nillumination: 77%\nbattery: 250 cd / m²\nBlack: 0.76 cd / m²\nContrast: 282: 1\nPartners\n\nIn terms of luminance matrix Inspiron 7548 performed poorly. An average of 204.3 cd / m² for the whole of the screen at maximum light intensity is low. For comparison, in the case of the HP Envy 15 Full HD matrix found an average of 285.5 cd / m²; Asus N551JK and Full HD matrix obtained 312.2 cd / m².\n\nColor reproduction in new condition was decent. DE2000 average error was 5.83 (ie greater than the desired level of at most 3). There was no zaniebieszczenie image.\nkolorówwierność color fidelity\nszarościskala gray scale\nkolorównasycenie color saturation\n\nThe viewing angles are wide, which means that the matrix provides good picture quality virtually any position. Outside, not much can be discussed using a laptop, as shiny glass touch screen so big causes reflections that much what you see on the screen.\nwidzeniakąty angles of view\non dworzena court\nPerformance\nunder the grille ... under the grille ...\n... Are ... the RAM slots are slots of RAM\n\nInspiron 7548 had tested the dual-core Intel Core i7-5500U (Broadwell) Intel. It is a low-voltage unit TDP of 15 W. The standard dual-core processors have a TDP of 35 W. The base of the CPU clock frequency is 2.4 GHz. Turbo Boost timing may increase to 2.9 GHz (two cores) or 3 GHz (one core). In the test laptop Turbo Boost worked in the calculations do not fully multithreaded. In the beginning was the CPU clock at 2.9 GHz such operations, but after some time ranged from 2.7 to 2.9 GHz.\n\nTested in 2013 Inspiron 7537 was equipped with a Core i7-4500U, which is the predecessor Core i7-5500U. Theoretically, the advantage of the latter should be small. In fact, in testing multi-threaded applications Cinebench Core i7-5500U achieved better results in half and single-threaded tests to 30% better, because Inspironie Core i7-4500U in 7537 did not present its full potential.\n\nInspiron 7548 is equipped with a graphics switching technology (Enduro), which allows the use of an integrated HD Graphics 5500 system and an additional graphics card AMD Radeon R7 M270. Generally, graphics switch goes on automatically. This solution, however, does not work as smoothly as Nvidia Optimus, so the user must sometimes interfere in its functioning.\n\nRadeon R7 M270 is not particularly powerful graphics chip. It has 384 stream processors and 825 MHz clock to. Technical characteristics of the GPU are the same as in the case Radeon R7 M265. The author does not found a difference between them. This fact is supported, moreover, 3DMark test results. Besides, after installing the Catalyst driver for Omega 14.12 figured the card in the device manager as \"Radeon R7 M265\".\n\nInspiron 7548 lost a lot on graphics performance compared to its predecessor, which was equipped with a GeForce GT 750M. In 3DMark 11 (Performances) the result of the hero of this review was almost worse than the achievement 1/4 Inspiron 7537th Fire Strike Standard Result Score New Inspiron turned out to be more than 1/3 of the outcome worse than its predecessor.\n\nGamers should look no Inspiron 7548th Some games run smoothly, however, the resolution of 1366 x 768 pixels at medium or partly on high quality settings. These are older titles and games with modest hardware requirements.\n\nThe use of the playing screen native resolution (3840 x 2160 pixels) can basically forget. In the test game GRID: Autosport in that resolution achieved 29.2 frames / sec for minimum settings, 12.7 frames / sec on average, 12.5 frames / s for high and 12.5 frames / s at maximum (benchmark does not record results below 12.5 frames / sec).\nCPU-Z-Z CPU CPUCPU\nCPU-Z-Z MBCPU MB\nCPU-Z MemoryCPU-Z Memory\nCPU-Z SPDCPU-Z SPD\nGPU-Z (Intel) GPU-Z (Intel)\nGPU-Z (AMD) GPU-Z (AMD)\nHWiNFOHWiNFO\nLatencyMonLatencyMon\n3DMark 06 Standard\n10024 points.\n3DMark Vantage P Result no PhysX\n6699 pts.\n3DMark 11 Performance\n2026 pts.\n3DMark (2013) Ice Storm Standard Score\n14562 points.\n3DMark (2013) Cloud Gate Standard Score\n4366 pts.\n3DMark (2013) Fire Strike Standard Score\n1129 pts.\nHelp\n... Compare\nPCMark 7 Score\n5417 pts.\n8 Home PCMark Score Accelerated v2\n2805 pts.\n8 Creative PCMark Score Accelerated v2\n3826 pts.\n8 Work PCMark Score Accelerated v2\n3413 pts.\nHelp\n... Compare\nCinebench R10 32bit Rendering Multiple CPUs\n9950\nCinebench R10 32bit Shading\n6269\nCinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit\n4634\nCinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64bit\n3.21 Points\nCinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64bit\n34.29 fps\nCinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit\n1.42 Points\nCinebench R15 Ref. Match 64bit\n98%\nCinebench R15 OpenGL 64bit\n37.01 fps\nCinebench R15 Multi 64bit CPU\n294 Points\nCinebench R15 Single 64bit CPU\n121 Points\nHelp\n... Compare\nCinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | Geekbench 3 | SunSpider | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | Peacekeeper\nCinebench R15\nMulti 64bit CPU (sort by value)\nDell Inspiron 15-7548\nRadeon R7 M270, 5500U, Liteon IT LCS-256L9S-11\n294 Points ~19%\nHP Envy 15 k203ng\nGeForce GTX 850M, 5500U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 HN-M101MBB ST1000LM024\n289 Points ~19% -2%\nAsus N551JK-CN166H\nGeForce GTX 850M, 4200H, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680\nPoints 323 ~21% + 10%\nToshiba Satellite L50-B-1TD\nRadeon R7 M260, 4510U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GMCU\n272 Points ~18% -7%\nToshiba Satellite P50t-B-10T\nRadeon R9 M265X, 4710HQ, Toshiba MQ01ABD100\n611 Points ~39% + 108%\nAcer Aspire V15 Nitro VN7-571G-574H\nGeForce GTX 850M, 5200U, ST500LM000 Seagate Hybrid Solid State Drive\n261 Points ~17% -11%\nDell Inspiron 15-7537\nGeForce GT 750M, 4500U, 256GB Samsung SSD SM841 MZ7PD256HAFV\n195 Points ~13% -34%\nSingle 64-bit CPU (sort by value)\nDell Inspiron 15-7548\nRadeon R7 M270, 5500U, Liteon IT LCS-256L9S-11\n121 Points ~69%\nHP Envy 15 k203ng\nGeForce GTX 850M, 5500U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 HN-M101MBB ST1000LM024\n120 Points ~68% -1%\nAsus N551JK-CN166H\nGeForce GTX 850M, 4200H, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680\n130 Points ~74% + 7%\nToshiba Satellite L50-B-1TD\nRadeon R7 M260, 4510U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GMCU\n119 Points ~68% -2%\nToshiba Satellite P50t-B-10T\nRadeon R9 M265X, 4710HQ, Toshiba MQ01ABD100\nPoints 133 ~76% + 10%\nAcer Aspire V15 Nitro VN7-571G-574H\nGeForce GTX 850M, 5200U, ST500LM000 Seagate Hybrid Solid State Drive\nPoints ~61% 108 -11%\nDell Inspiron 15-7537\nGeForce GT 750M, 4500U, 256GB Samsung SSD SM841 MZ7PD256HAFV\n105 Points ~60% -13%\n\n* ... Less is more\nPCMark 8 | PCMark 7\nPCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value)\nDell Inspiron 15-7548\nRadeon R7 M270, 5500U, Liteon IT LCS-256L9S-11\n2805 Points ~51%\nHP Envy 15 k203ng\nGeForce GTX 850M, 5500U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 HN-M101MBB ST1000LM024\nPoints 3130 ~57% + 12%\nAsus N551JK-CN166H\nGeForce GTX 850M, 4200H, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680\n3113 Points ~57% + 11%\nToshiba Satellite L50-B-1TD\nRadeon R7 M260, 4510U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GMCU\n3291 Points ~60% + 17%\nToshiba Satellite P50t-B-10T\nRadeon R9 M265X, 4710HQ, Toshiba MQ01ABD100\nPoints 3386 ~62% + 21%\nAcer Aspire V15 Nitro VN7-571G-574H\nGeForce GTX 850M, 5200U, ST500LM000 Seagate Hybrid Solid State Drive\nPoints 3096 ~56% + 10%\nSSDdysk SSD drive\n\nData carrier was in this laptop SSD Lite On a capacity of 256 GB (available disk space is about 200 GB). It was a SATA 2.5 \". The AS SSD test it reached a pretty good line transfers. Reading was almost 488 MB / s and write has a value of 416 MB / s. Worse against competing SSD present the results of tests 4K (read: 31.32 MB / s, write: 68.7 MB / s).\n\nThe results of measuring the overall performance of the PCMark test 8 does not look particularly favorably compared to similar laptops. Inspiron 7548 it achieved significantly worse results than processor fitted with the older generation (i7-4510U) and also having an SSD Toshiba Satellite L50-B. This is due to the high resolution template Della (3840 x 2160 pixels). When the test was carried out in Full HD, instead of 2805 (Home) 3826 (Creative) and 3413 points. (Work) were obtained respectively 3502, 4225 and 4367 points.\nCrystalDiskMark 3.0\nAS SSD\nhddimg\nIT Liteon LCS-256L9S-11\nSequential Read: 497.3 MB / s\nSequential Write: 418 MB / s\n512K Read: 373.9 MB / s\n512K Write: 397 MB / s\n4K Read: 34.71 MB / s\n4K Write: 84.13 MB / s\n4K QD32 Read: 334 MB / s\nQD32 4K Write: 323.3 MB / s\n3DMark 11 | 3DMark (2013) | 3DMark 06\n3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance (sort by value)\nDell Inspiron 15-7548\nRadeon R7 M270, 5500U, Liteon IT LCS-256L9S-11\n2026 Points ~11%\nHP Envy 15 k203ng\nGeForce GTX 850M, 5500U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 HN-M101MBB ST1000LM024\n3961 Points ~22% + 96%\nAsus N551JK-CN166H\nGeForce GTX 850M, 4200H, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680\n4255 Points ~24% + 110%\nToshiba Satellite L50-B-1TD\nRadeon R7 M260, 4510U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GMCU\n1905 Points ~11% -6%\nAcer Aspire V15 Nitro VN7-571G-574H\nGeForce GTX 850M, 5200U, ST500LM000 Seagate Hybrid Solid State Drive\n3912 Points ~22% + 93%\nDell Inspiron 15-7537\nGeForce GT 750M, 4500U, 256GB Samsung SSD SM841 MZ7PD256HAFV\nPoints 2632 ~15% + 30%\nAcer Aspire V 15 Nitro VN7-571G-56NX\nGeForce 840M, 4210U, Kingston RBU-SNS8100S3128GD\n2482 Points ~14% + 23%\nAsus Zenbook UX303LA-R4342H\nHD Graphics 5500, 5500U, SanDisk X300SE SD7SB3Q256G\n1159 Points ~6% -43%\nlow med. high ultra\nThe Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011) 67.1 43.3 31.6 19.1 fps\nDiablo III (2012) 94.5 62.1 51 31.4 fps\nHitman: Absolution (2012) 40.7 33.2 17.3 7.6 fps\nTomb Raider (2013) 79 41.9 28.9 13.8 fps\nStarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013) 208 72 41.6 15.6 fps\nThief (2014) 28.6 19.3 16.3 8.7 fps\nGRID: Autosport (2014) 146.7 53.8 25.2 14.4 fps\nRisen 3: Titan Lords (2014) 51.8 31.9 13.8 10.9 fps\nMiddle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014) 37.9 22.6 13.4 10.2 fps\nRyse: Son of Rome (2014) 32.6 20.9 9.9 9.3 fps\nF1 2014 (2014) 97 59 31 21 fps\nFar Cry 4 (2014) 38.4 27.8 13.1 10.3 fps\nDragon Age: Inquisition (2014) 37.2 31.7 17.8 12.3 fps\nEvolve (2015) 30.9 23 12.8 11 fps\nBattlefield Hardline (2015) 47.4 34 14.7 9.4 fps\nTomb Raider | The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim | Diablo III | Hitman: Absolution | StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm | Thief | GRID: Autosport | Risen 3: Titan Lords | Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor | Ryse: Son of Rome | F1 2014 | Far Cry 4 | Dragon Age: Inquisition | Evolve | Battlefield Hardline\nTomb Raider\nNormal Preset 1366x768 AA: FX AF: 4x (sort by value)\nDell Inspiron 15-7548\nRadeon R7 M270, 5500U, Liteon IT LCS-256L9S-11\n41.9 fps ~7%\nHP Envy 15 k203ng\nGeForce GTX 850M, 5500U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 HN-M101MBB ST1000LM024\n112.1 fps ~20% + 168%\nToshiba Satellite L50-B-1TD\nRadeon R7 M260, 4510U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GMCU\n36.2 fps ~6% -14%\nToshiba Satellite P50t-B-10T\nRadeon R9 M265X, 4710HQ, Toshiba MQ01ABD100\n73.8 fps ~13% + 76%\nAcer Aspire V15 Nitro VN7-571G-574H\nGeForce GTX 850M, 5200U, ST500LM000 Seagate Hybrid Solid State Drive\n116.1 fps ~20% + 177%\nDell Inspiron 15-7537\nGeForce GT 750M, 4500U, 256GB Samsung SSD SM841 MZ7PD256HAFV\n81.7 fps ~14% + 95%\nAcer Aspire V 15 Nitro VN7-571G-56NX\nGeForce 840M, 4210U, Kingston RBU-SNS8100S3128GD\n66.5 fps ~12% + 59%\nAsus Zenbook UX303LA-R4342H\nHD Graphics 5500, 5500U, SanDisk X300SE SD7SB3Q256G\n28.5 fps ~5% -32%\n1366x768 High Preset AA: FX AF: 8x (sort by value)\nDell Inspiron 15-7548\nRadeon R7 M270, 5500U, Liteon IT LCS-256L9S-11\n28.9 fps ~6%\nHP Envy 15 k203ng\nGeForce GTX 850M, 5500U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 HN-M101MBB ST1000LM024\n65 fps ~14% + 125%\nToshiba Satellite L50-B-1TD\nRadeon R7 M260, 4510U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GMCU\n21.3 fps ~5% -26%\nToshiba Satellite P50t-B-10T\nRadeon R9 M265X, 4710HQ, Toshiba MQ01ABD100\n52 fps ~11% + 80%\nAcer Aspire V15 Nitro VN7-571G-574H\nGeForce GTX 850M, 5200U, ST500LM000 Seagate Hybrid Solid State Drive\n67.5 fps ~15% + 134%\nDell Inspiron 15-7537\nGeForce GT 750M, 4500U, 256GB Samsung SSD SM841 MZ7PD256HAFV\n57 fps ~12% + 97%\nAcer Aspire V 15 Nitro VN7-571G-56NX\nGeForce 840M, 4210U, Kingston RBU-SNS8100S3128GD\n36.4 fps ~8% + 26%\nAsus Zenbook UX303LA-R4342H\nHD Graphics 5500, 5500U, SanDisk X300SE SD7SB3Q256G\n18.6 fps ~4% -36%\nImpact on the environment\n\nNoise\n\nNo load components discussed laptop was usually silent. Under load the noise level does not reach exorbitant levels. Achieved with a normal load of 36.6 dB and a maximum - 41.5 dB. HP Envy 15 i5-5500U processor and GTX 850M graphics card is under load much louder (respectively 42.1 and 44.8 dB), just like the Asus N551JK i5-4200H processor and GTX 850M graphics card (respectively 42 and 44 8 dB). HP and Asus also proved to be a bit louder in the test without load, because they have hard drives rather than SSDs.\n\nUnfortunately, the occurrence of a Dell whistling. You can hear it was often at rest. Usually it cichło when the computer was loaded.\n\nNoise\nplay 29/29 / 29dB\nload 36.6 / 41.5 dB\n \n 30 dB\nquiet 40 dB\n50 dB audible\nannoying\nmin:, med:, max: Voltcraft sl-451 (15 cm)\nHeat\ntemperature components in the test complete assemblies obciążeniatemperatury full load test\n\nIn the test of full load (Prime95 and FurMark) timing was 2.4-2.7 GHz CPU and GPU clock speed - 825 MHz. CPU temperature reached a maximum of 76 ° C, and the temperature of the graphics card - 65 ° C. In the hottest part of the housing measured in the assay of 54 ° C.\nstress\ncool\n 35.9 ° C 43.5 ° C 32.5 ° C\n 31.7 ° C 40.9 ° C 28.3 ° C\n 26.8 ° C 24.6 ° C 26.8 ° C\nmax. in general: 43.5 ° C\nAverage: 32.3 ° C\n24.4 ° C 54 ° C 29.5 ° C\n24.4 ° C 29.3 ° C 26.8 ° C\n23.2 ° C 25.4 ° C 25.2 ° C\nmax. in general: 54 ° C\nAverage: 29.1 ° C\nAC 47.9 ° C | ambient temperature 20.5 ° C | Fluke 62 Max\nSpeakers\n\nThe stereo speakers are disposed at the front edge, the bottom side of the housing. They produce a balanced sound that does not tire even after long listening. As with most laptop speakers, they suffer from shortage of bass.\nBattery Performance\n\nInspiron 7548 can be equipped with a battery with a capacity of 43 or 56 Wh. UUT had the roomier.\n\nThe test simulates reading a text document (Battery Eater Reader's Test with a minimum intensity of the backlight) obtained 10:33 h. Asus N551JK who had a battery of the same capacity, achieved in this test 7:16 h. The conducted according to the latest test procedure for simulating the use of Internet via Wi-Fi has brought 4:24 h. The HP Envy 15, which had a battery with a capacity of 41 Wh, acted in this test a bit longer (4:49 h). Playing a video from your Big Buck Bunny discussed laptop lasted 3:58 hours. Acer Aspire VN7-571G battery with a capacity of 52 Wh obtained in this test result of 79% higher (7:07 h).\n\nGenerally, battery life time hero of this review a bit disappointing. They are worse than the results Inspiron 7537, which had a battery with a capacity of 58 Wh.\nPower Consumption\noff / standby 0 / 0.1 W\nclearance of 6.1 / 15 / 15.5\nload 47.7 / 64.1 in\n \nKey: min:, med:, max: Extech 380803 Power Analyzer\nBattery Performance\nplay\n10h 33min\nnetwork via WLAN v1.3 (IE 11)\n4h 24min\nBig Buck Bunny 1080p H.264\n3h 58min\nload\n1h 21min\nDell Inspiron 15-7548\nR7 M270 / 5500U HP Envy 15 k203ng\nGTX 850M / 5500U Asus N551JK-CN166H\nGTX 850M / 4200H Toshiba Satellite L50-B-1TD\nR7 M260 / 4510U Toshiba Satellite P50t-B-10T\nR9 M265X / 4710HQ Acer Aspire V15 Nitro VN7-571G-574H\nGTX 850M / 5200U Dell Inspiron 15-7537\nGT 750M / 4500U\nBattery Runtime\n9%\n\n-19%\n\n-51%\n\n69%\n\n-1%\nReader / Idle 633 436 -31%\n269 -58%\n797 26%\n727 15%\nLoad 81 76 -6%\n45 -44%\n161 99%\n67 -17%\nWiFi v1.3 264 289 9%\n448 70%\n\nH.264 238 427 79%\n\nWiFi 271 328 152 392\nFor\n+ Aluminum case\n+ SSD (in a test configuration)\n+ Where low temperatures\n+ Mostly quiet\n+ Access to the components\nAgainst\n- Unsung matrix parameters\n- So-so battery life time\n- Weaker than its predecessor, graphics card\nA Summary\n\nInspiron 7548 is a slim laptop with screen 15.6 \"having an aluminum housing. Core i7 processor provides sufficient performance for everyday applications. AMD graphics card allows you to play the titles of very high hardware requirements. It is weaker than the GPU used in Inspironie 7537, so in this terms there was a regression. SSD, how was equipped with the UUT, assured the smooth operation of the system. Inspiron 7548 laptop is silent. His temperature proved to be the rather moderate. Though not cover the service provided, access to the internal components is not a problem. The matrix does not 4K made the best impression on the author - apart from wide angles of view of its parameters are not particularly good. A certain professions were also times battery life - Inspiron 7548 fell into this category, worse than its predecessor, and many cheaper laptops.\n\nMultimedia laptop best buy in mobilQ.pl\nlaptop home - mobilQ.pl\n\n \n> Tests and reviews laptops - Polish edition - laptops, notebooks, opinions, advice, comparison, test database, news> Laptops> Review Dell Inspiron 15 7548\nApril 11, 2015\n"
}
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
So we don't get stuff like
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: