Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[16.0][OU-IMP] account: Rectifiy use_in_tax_closing in old repartition lines #4425

Merged

Conversation

pedrobaeza
Copy link
Member

This field was introduced in v14, but it was not impacting in anything noticeable till this version, where not having this marked in the taxes lines makes that the tax lines take the analytic dimensions no matter if the analytic field is marked or not.

As a compromise solution, let's assign this as True for those that have no value, which are those coming from old versions.

@Tecnativa

This field was introduced in v14, but it was not impacting in anything
noticeable till this version, where not having this marked in the taxes
lines makes that the tax lines take the analytic dimensions no matter if
the analytic field is marked or not.

As a compromise solution, let's assign this as True for those that have
no value, which are those coming from old versions.
@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza added this to the 16.0 milestone May 3, 2024
@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza merged commit ee7a949 into OCA:16.0 May 3, 2024
2 checks passed
@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza deleted the 16.0-ou_imp-account-use_in_tax_closing branch May 3, 2024 18:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants