[MIG][9.0] connector_dns #6
Conversation
|
@elicoidal - Can you please mark this as WIP and v9 milestone? Also, how can I get write in this repo? |
|
Changes Unknown when pulling e2701ed on laslabs:release/9.0 into * on OCA:9.0*. |
[FIX] format [IMP] format [IMP] unit test [IMP] unit test
* Separate models by file
* Add `import_synchronizer`
* Add `export_synchronizer`
* Add `delete_synchronizer`
* Add `mapper`
* Add `fail_date` to abstract bind, remove state
* Add `dns.record.type` model and default data
* Add external date field handling to binder
* Rename `dns.domain` to `dns.zone`
* Remove `line` field from `dns.record`
* Change inheritance structure, add a `{model_name}.bind` framework
* Add security
* Code cleanup
* Add test coverage
* Don't cover test assets
* Change bind field to `odoo_id` to ease future migration
* Improve ReadMe
* Require zone in record * Fix action names in backend, zone, record * Remove states from backend and zone
* Add empty group in connector settings for DNS
* Bump version * Rename Environment to ConnectorEnvironment * Prefer odoo tags to openerp/data in views
|
Changes Unknown when pulling da81be8 on laslabs:release/9.0 into * on OCA:9.0*. |
|
@lasley the server-tool maintainers have write access. |
|
@elicoidal - I am a server PSC & don't have access. This looks to be in a category of its own instead. |
|
@lasley Indeed it was unclear at the beginning. I am in favor of adding you to the infrastructure maintainer group ( @pedrobaeza @dreispt what do you think?) |
|
Yeah, I agree on adding him to the PSC |
|
Hi everyone, does this one need additional info or could it be merged ? |
|
@lasley you were the lead here. Can you update us? |
|
I haven't made any changes here, so we should be good for review. We dropped this plan for Rancher instead, so I haven't actually tested any of this functionally as far as I remember. Would love to hear if someone has actually used it on v8 (or this version on 9), but I'm for an optimistic merge based on code review as well. |
This is a forward port of #4 for v9 (including currently pending (noahzaozao/infrastructure-dns#5). In my eyes, that PR is handled, so I need this in v9 so I can begin
connector_dns_route53in 9Dependent on merge of: