-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
misleading documentation for report parameters #3
Labels
Milestone
Comments
The workflow script needs to be updated too. It does not accommodate thee omission of the reference parameter. |
fruce-ki
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 27, 2022
fruce-ki
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 27, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
-r
is documented as defaulting to1
. As of version 0.8.* this is no longer the case. The parameter can be omitted completely.Omiting the parameter has new behaviour, compared to setting it to 1:
Setting it to 1 (or other integer(s)) will designate the corresponding samples as reference samples. Barcodes will be named by order of decreasing abundance in the reference, and any barcodes seen in bottlenecked samples that are not seen in the reference will be removed from all the samples.
Omitting it allows processing of batches that do not have a reference sample. Barcodes will be named based on their abundances in the first available sample, but no filtering will take place based on their presence/absence in that sample.
Update report readme
Update workflow readme
Update workflow
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: