Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

missing glyphs #6

Open
m4rc1e opened this issue Jul 11, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

missing glyphs #6

m4rc1e opened this issue Jul 11, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@m4rc1e
Copy link
Contributor

m4rc1e commented Jul 11, 2019

This family is missing some glyphs when I compare it against the family hosted on Google Fonts

Fontbakery report

Fontbakery version: 0.7.8

[1] Family checks
🔥 FAIL: Verify that each group of fonts with the same nameID 1 has maximum of 4 fonts

[1] Sansita-Black.ttf
🔥 FAIL: Check font has same encoded glyphs as version hosted on fonts.google.com
  • com.google.fonts/check/production_encoded_glyphs
  • 🔥 FAIL Font is missing the following glyphs from the previous release [0x2002, 0x2003, 0x2004, 0x2005, 0x1E0C, 0x1E0D, 0x1E92, 0x1E93, 0x1E44, 0x1E45, 0x2153, 0x2154, 0x1E5A, 0x215B, 0x1E5B, 0x1E63, 0x01F1, 0x01F2, 0x01F3]

[1] Sansita-BlackItalic.ttf
🔥 FAIL: Check font has same encoded glyphs as version hosted on fonts.google.com
  • com.google.fonts/check/production_encoded_glyphs
  • 🔥 FAIL Font is missing the following glyphs from the previous release [0x2002, 0x2003, 0x2004, 0x2005, 0x1E0C, 0x1E0D, 0x1E92, 0x1E93, 0x1E44, 0x1E45, 0x2153, 0x2154, 0x1E5A, 0x215B, 0x1E5B, 0x1E63, 0x01F1, 0x01F2, 0x01F3]

[1] Sansita-Bold.ttf
🔥 FAIL: Check font has same encoded glyphs as version hosted on fonts.google.com
  • com.google.fonts/check/production_encoded_glyphs
  • 🔥 FAIL Font is missing the following glyphs from the previous release [0x2002, 0x2003, 0x2004, 0x2005, 0x1E0C, 0x1E0D, 0x1E92, 0x1E93, 0x1E44, 0x1E45, 0x2153, 0x2154, 0x1E5A, 0x215B, 0x1E5B, 0x1E63, 0x01F1, 0x01F2, 0x01F3]

[1] Sansita-BoldItalic.ttf
🔥 FAIL: Check font has same encoded glyphs as version hosted on fonts.google.com
  • com.google.fonts/check/production_encoded_glyphs
  • 🔥 FAIL Font is missing the following glyphs from the previous release [0x2002, 0x2003, 0x2004, 0x2005, 0x1E0C, 0x1E0D, 0x1E92, 0x1E93, 0x1E44, 0x1E45, 0x2153, 0x2154, 0x1E5A, 0x215B, 0x1E5B, 0x1E63, 0x01F1, 0x01F2, 0x01F3]

[1] Sansita-ExtraBold.ttf
🔥 FAIL: Check font has same encoded glyphs as version hosted on fonts.google.com
  • com.google.fonts/check/production_encoded_glyphs
  • 🔥 FAIL Font is missing the following glyphs from the previous release [0x2002, 0x2003, 0x2004, 0x2005, 0x1E0C, 0x1E0D, 0x1E92, 0x1E93, 0x1E44, 0x1E45, 0x2153, 0x2154, 0x1E5A, 0x215B, 0x1E5B, 0x1E63, 0x01F1, 0x01F2, 0x01F3]

[1] Sansita-ExtraBoldItalic.ttf
🔥 FAIL: Check font has same encoded glyphs as version hosted on fonts.google.com
  • com.google.fonts/check/production_encoded_glyphs
  • 🔥 FAIL Font is missing the following glyphs from the previous release [0x2002, 0x2003, 0x2004, 0x2005, 0x1E0C, 0x1E0D, 0x1E92, 0x1E93, 0x1E44, 0x1E45, 0x2153, 0x2154, 0x1E5A, 0x215B, 0x1E5B, 0x1E63, 0x01F1, 0x01F2, 0x01F3]

[1] Sansita-Regular.ttf
🔥 FAIL: Check font has same encoded glyphs as version hosted on fonts.google.com
  • com.google.fonts/check/production_encoded_glyphs
  • 🔥 FAIL Font is missing the following glyphs from the previous release [0x2002, 0x2003, 0x2004, 0x2005, 0x1E0C, 0x1E0D, 0x1E92, 0x1E93, 0x1E44, 0x1E45, 0x2153, 0x2154, 0x1E5A, 0x215B, 0x1E5B, 0x1E63, 0x01F1, 0x01F2, 0x01F3]

Summary

💔 ERROR 🔥 FAIL ⚠ WARN 💤 SKIP ℹ INFO 🍞 PASS
0 8 55 653 73 824
0% 0% 3% 40% 5% 51%

Note: The following loglevels were omitted in this report:

  • WARN
  • SKIP
  • INFO
  • PASS

Please merge #5 first then add these glyphs. Once this is done, I'll pr the family back to google/fonts and replace google/fonts#1676

@Omnibus-Type
Copy link
Owner

Updated the fonts. Thanks for the advice.

@m4rc1e
Copy link
Contributor Author

m4rc1e commented Jul 17, 2019

my #5 pr is now broken. I needed you to merge that first then fix it.

@Omnibus-Type Omnibus-Type reopened this Jul 17, 2019
@Omnibus-Type
Copy link
Owner

How do you suggest we proceed?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants