We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
This family is missing some glyphs when I compare it against the family hosted on Google Fonts
Fontbakery version: 0.7.8
Note: The following loglevels were omitted in this report:
Please merge #5 first then add these glyphs. Once this is done, I'll pr the family back to google/fonts and replace google/fonts#1676
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Updated the fonts. Thanks for the advice.
Sorry, something went wrong.
my #5 pr is now broken. I needed you to merge that first then fix it.
How do you suggest we proceed?
No branches or pull requests
This family is missing some glyphs when I compare it against the family hosted on Google Fonts
Fontbakery report
Fontbakery version: 0.7.8
[1] Family checks
🔥 FAIL: Verify that each group of fonts with the same nameID 1 has maximum of 4 fonts
[1] Sansita-Black.ttf
🔥 FAIL: Check font has same encoded glyphs as version hosted on fonts.google.com
[1] Sansita-BlackItalic.ttf
🔥 FAIL: Check font has same encoded glyphs as version hosted on fonts.google.com
[1] Sansita-Bold.ttf
🔥 FAIL: Check font has same encoded glyphs as version hosted on fonts.google.com
[1] Sansita-BoldItalic.ttf
🔥 FAIL: Check font has same encoded glyphs as version hosted on fonts.google.com
[1] Sansita-ExtraBold.ttf
🔥 FAIL: Check font has same encoded glyphs as version hosted on fonts.google.com
[1] Sansita-ExtraBoldItalic.ttf
🔥 FAIL: Check font has same encoded glyphs as version hosted on fonts.google.com
[1] Sansita-Regular.ttf
🔥 FAIL: Check font has same encoded glyphs as version hosted on fonts.google.com
Summary
Note: The following loglevels were omitted in this report:
Please merge #5 first then add these glyphs. Once this is done, I'll pr the family back to google/fonts and replace google/fonts#1676
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: