Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v1.007 update #5

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

v1.007 update #5

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

m4rc1e
Copy link
Contributor

@m4rc1e m4rc1e commented Jul 11, 2019

  • Fix metadata to comply with gf spec

Fontbakery report

Fontbakery version: 0.7.8

[1] Family checks
🔥 FAIL: Verify that each group of fonts with the same nameID 1 has maximum of 4 fonts

[1] Sansita-Black.ttf
🔥 FAIL: Check font has same encoded glyphs as version hosted on fonts.google.com
  • com.google.fonts/check/production_encoded_glyphs
  • 🔥 FAIL Font is missing the following glyphs from the previous release [0x2002, 0x2003, 0x2004, 0x2005, 0x1E0C, 0x1E0D, 0x1E92, 0x1E93, 0x1E44, 0x1E45, 0x2153, 0x2154, 0x1E5A, 0x215B, 0x1E5B, 0x1E63, 0x01F1, 0x01F2, 0x01F3]

[1] Sansita-BlackItalic.ttf
🔥 FAIL: Check font has same encoded glyphs as version hosted on fonts.google.com
  • com.google.fonts/check/production_encoded_glyphs
  • 🔥 FAIL Font is missing the following glyphs from the previous release [0x2002, 0x2003, 0x2004, 0x2005, 0x1E0C, 0x1E0D, 0x1E92, 0x1E93, 0x1E44, 0x1E45, 0x2153, 0x2154, 0x1E5A, 0x215B, 0x1E5B, 0x1E63, 0x01F1, 0x01F2, 0x01F3]

[1] Sansita-Bold.ttf
🔥 FAIL: Check font has same encoded glyphs as version hosted on fonts.google.com
  • com.google.fonts/check/production_encoded_glyphs
  • 🔥 FAIL Font is missing the following glyphs from the previous release [0x2002, 0x2003, 0x2004, 0x2005, 0x1E0C, 0x1E0D, 0x1E92, 0x1E93, 0x1E44, 0x1E45, 0x2153, 0x2154, 0x1E5A, 0x215B, 0x1E5B, 0x1E63, 0x01F1, 0x01F2, 0x01F3]

[1] Sansita-BoldItalic.ttf
🔥 FAIL: Check font has same encoded glyphs as version hosted on fonts.google.com
  • com.google.fonts/check/production_encoded_glyphs
  • 🔥 FAIL Font is missing the following glyphs from the previous release [0x2002, 0x2003, 0x2004, 0x2005, 0x1E0C, 0x1E0D, 0x1E92, 0x1E93, 0x1E44, 0x1E45, 0x2153, 0x2154, 0x1E5A, 0x215B, 0x1E5B, 0x1E63, 0x01F1, 0x01F2, 0x01F3]

[1] Sansita-ExtraBold.ttf
🔥 FAIL: Check font has same encoded glyphs as version hosted on fonts.google.com
  • com.google.fonts/check/production_encoded_glyphs
  • 🔥 FAIL Font is missing the following glyphs from the previous release [0x2002, 0x2003, 0x2004, 0x2005, 0x1E0C, 0x1E0D, 0x1E92, 0x1E93, 0x1E44, 0x1E45, 0x2153, 0x2154, 0x1E5A, 0x215B, 0x1E5B, 0x1E63, 0x01F1, 0x01F2, 0x01F3]

[1] Sansita-ExtraBoldItalic.ttf
🔥 FAIL: Check font has same encoded glyphs as version hosted on fonts.google.com
  • com.google.fonts/check/production_encoded_glyphs
  • 🔥 FAIL Font is missing the following glyphs from the previous release [0x2002, 0x2003, 0x2004, 0x2005, 0x1E0C, 0x1E0D, 0x1E92, 0x1E93, 0x1E44, 0x1E45, 0x2153, 0x2154, 0x1E5A, 0x215B, 0x1E5B, 0x1E63, 0x01F1, 0x01F2, 0x01F3]

[1] Sansita-Regular.ttf
🔥 FAIL: Check font has same encoded glyphs as version hosted on fonts.google.com
  • com.google.fonts/check/production_encoded_glyphs
  • 🔥 FAIL Font is missing the following glyphs from the previous release [0x2002, 0x2003, 0x2004, 0x2005, 0x1E0C, 0x1E0D, 0x1E92, 0x1E93, 0x1E44, 0x1E45, 0x2153, 0x2154, 0x1E5A, 0x215B, 0x1E5B, 0x1E63, 0x01F1, 0x01F2, 0x01F3]

Summary

💔 ERROR 🔥 FAIL ⚠ WARN 💤 SKIP ℹ INFO 🍞 PASS
0 8 55 653 73 824
0% 0% 3% 40% 5% 51%

Note: The following loglevels were omitted in this report:

  • WARN
  • SKIP
  • INFO
  • PASS

Desktop_Windows_10_chrome_69 0_
Win Chrome 69

- Fix metadata to comply with gf spec
This was referenced Jul 11, 2019
@Omnibus-Type
Copy link
Owner

Hi @m4rc1e, I'm trying to resolve the conflict through terminal but I could only copy two branches (pr5 and m4rc1e-gf-mastering, the problem still persists because I can not do rebase and merge to the base branch. Tell me if there is anything I need to do to resolve the conflict between files.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants