Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Taken from the upstream repo https://github.com/Omnibus-Type/Sansita at commit Omnibus-Type/Sansita@e5e62bf
FontBakery Report:
Fontbakery report
[2] Family checks
🔥 FAIL: Fonts have consistent PANOSE family type?
🔥 FAIL: Fonts have consistent PANOSE proportion?
[4] Sansita-Bold.ttf
🔥 FAIL: Fonts have equal numbers of glyphs?
🔥 FAIL: Fonts have equal glyph names?
🔥 FAIL: Glyph names are all valid?
🔥 FAIL: Checking font version fields (head and name table).
[7] Sansita-Italic-VF.ttf
💔 ERROR: Version number has increased since previous release on Google Fonts?
🔥 FAIL: Is 'gasp' table set to optimize rendering?
🔥 FAIL: Font enables smart dropout control in "prep" table instructions?
gftools fix-nonhinting
script.🔥 FAIL: Fonts have equal numbers of glyphs?
🔥 FAIL: Fonts have equal glyph names?
🔥 FAIL: Checking with Microsoft Font Validator.
🔥 FAIL: Glyph names are all valid?
[5] Sansita-ExtraBoldItalic.ttf
🔥 FAIL: Fonts have equal numbers of glyphs?
🔥 FAIL: Fonts have equal glyph names?
🔥 FAIL: Checking with Microsoft Font Validator.
🔥 FAIL: Glyph names are all valid?
🔥 FAIL: Checking font version fields (head and name table).
[4] Sansita-BoldItalic.ttf
🔥 FAIL: Fonts have equal numbers of glyphs?
🔥 FAIL: Fonts have equal glyph names?
🔥 FAIL: Glyph names are all valid?
🔥 FAIL: Checking font version fields (head and name table).
[5] Sansita-Black.ttf
🔥 FAIL: Font has all expected currency sign characters?
🔥 FAIL: Fonts have equal numbers of glyphs?
🔥 FAIL: Fonts have equal glyph names?
🔥 FAIL: Glyph names are all valid?
🔥 FAIL: Checking font version fields (head and name table).
[4] Sansita-Regular.ttf
🔥 FAIL: Fonts have equal numbers of glyphs?
🔥 FAIL: Fonts have equal glyph names?
🔥 FAIL: Glyph names are all valid?
🔥 FAIL: Checking font version fields (head and name table).
[4] Sansita-Italic.ttf
🔥 FAIL: Fonts have equal numbers of glyphs?
🔥 FAIL: Fonts have equal glyph names?
🔥 FAIL: Glyph names are all valid?
🔥 FAIL: Checking font version fields (head and name table).
[6] Sansita-BlackItalic.ttf
🔥 FAIL: Font has all expected currency sign characters?
🔥 FAIL: Fonts have equal numbers of glyphs?
🔥 FAIL: Fonts have equal glyph names?
🔥 FAIL: Checking with Microsoft Font Validator.
🔥 FAIL: Glyph names are all valid?
🔥 FAIL: Checking font version fields (head and name table).
[4] Sansita-ExtraBold.ttf
🔥 FAIL: Fonts have equal numbers of glyphs?
🔥 FAIL: Fonts have equal glyph names?
🔥 FAIL: Glyph names are all valid?
🔥 FAIL: Checking font version fields (head and name table).
Summary
Note: The following loglevels were omitted in this report:
DiffBrowsers Report:
Imgs
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13Kyd90cTcbWOjkh_sQzcOA6tFi_QFRy4/view?usp=drivesdk
GFR
http://www.gf-regression.com/compare/8d54920a-0d40-4949-ac49-f284af68c5a4
@davelab6 When we released this font, we didn't run it through ttf autothint. For this update, I've kept it unhinted, hence why we're getting the gasp error.