Skip to content

Conversation

jarofgreen
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@jarofgreen jarofgreen self-assigned this Sep 4, 2025
@emmajclegg
Copy link

emmajclegg commented Sep 12, 2025

Thanks @jarofgreen - great to see this. I've had a look at http://dev.org-id.guide/list/UG-RSB

I think the page content looks as agreed (i.e. to remove the list score, to add a link to the searchable online database..)

Suggestions:

  • I think the "Find and use identifiers" block should sit above the "How to Use" block. The main thing I'm looking for is information on how to find an identifier. The "How to Use" block is also written fairly technically, so may be off-putting to some visitors.
  • Can we make the "Search the list here." line more visible? e.g. by putting it in its own section block further up the page, or using larger/bolder font. I didn't notice it had been added initially.

For http://dev.org-id.guide/list/ZA-PBO - this looks fine, no comments. Much more obvious about the deprecation status which is good!

Happy to discuss.

@kd-ods
Copy link
Contributor

kd-ods commented Sep 17, 2025

Thanks, @jarofgreen - I agree with @emmajclegg's feedback.

Can we make the "Search the list here." line more visible

How about turning this into a button, like so:

image

What do you think?

This also raises another UI issue. On the left of the page there's the 'Back to List' button. I think this would be better titled 'Back to results' (given that we should reserve the word 'list' for the identifier lists about which org-id holds records).

@kd-ods
Copy link
Contributor

kd-ods commented Sep 17, 2025

... and - sorry - just one more thing, Columbo-style.

For deprecated pages, could we make the following text more precise:

'This list is deprecated and should only be used for historical information!'

So maybe:

'This record is deprecated and should only be used for reference.'

or:

'This record is deprecated and should only be used for interpreting older datasets.'

@jarofgreen jarofgreen force-pushed the next-work-on-list-page branch from f1bc098 to 047ab9a Compare September 17, 2025 15:45
@jarofgreen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Updates made!

@emmajclegg
Copy link

Thanks @jarofgreen - looks good to me! No further comments

@kd-ods
Copy link
Contributor

kd-ods commented Sep 18, 2025

Looks good to me too, James. Thanks!

@jarofgreen jarofgreen merged commit d780cb5 into next Sep 18, 2025
2 checks passed
@jarofgreen jarofgreen deleted the next-work-on-list-page branch September 18, 2025 16:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants