-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Minelaying improvements #20959
Minelaying improvements #20959
Conversation
39505b9
to
577d821
Compare
No changes were pushed |
577d821
to
b06ac56
Compare
I did mess up the first push (with the fixes), but the second push went through (though I forgot about the It seems that the GitHub's Compare feature between two commits (where one or both could be already "force-pushed" out of the repo) isn't working properly, because Commits and Files tabs show the changes correctly. |
you just removed |
b06ac56
to
4a5f6f8
Compare
In order to make cancellation of mine laying work correctly, I had to add another method to Also This is how the minelayer unit looks in OpenE2140 with current changes in the PR. I made a custom and very simple |
4a5f6f8
to
9c7bebb
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Final nits, otherwise LGTM
24083d2
to
a14e056
Compare
a14e056
to
0d3c148
Compare
Second PR with
Minelayer
improvements:Minelayer
exposes static method for creatingBeginMinefield
orderNo. 3 is useful for mods that would want to change the way this feature is activated.