Skip to content

Conversation

MattiSG
Copy link
Member

@MattiSG MattiSG commented May 9, 2025

Based on a recent provisioning experience:

  • Clarify that minimum specifications are minimum and not recommended
  • Clarify that geolocation is mandatory and not recommended
  • Update OS requirements
  • Add examples for data storage size

Open question on my side: since the development team uses macOS@15, would it be accurate to say that there is “continuous testing” on that platform as well, and integrate it in the list of “guaranteed compatibility”?

@MattiSG MattiSG requested a review from Ndpnt May 9, 2025 10:06
Copy link

netlify bot commented May 9, 2025

Deploy Preview for open-terms-archive-docs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit e23e2f8
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/open-terms-archive-docs/deploys/681e0218d58655000875470b
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-177--open-terms-archive-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.


The following operating systems should be compatible, but are not guaranteed:

- Debian 11 or higher
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I know it is not in out tests but all the collections we administrate are deployed on Debian 11, so I think we can guarantee that it works on that operating system

@Ndpnt
Copy link
Member

Ndpnt commented May 9, 2025

Open question on my side: since the development team uses macOS@15, would it be accurate to say that there is “continuous testing” on that platform as well, and integrate it in the list of “guaranteed compatibility”?

I would say yes, and the same for Debian 11

The core team develops with macOS 15 and deploys on Debian
@MattiSG MattiSG requested a review from Ndpnt May 9, 2025 13:24
@MattiSG MattiSG enabled auto-merge May 9, 2025 13:25
@MattiSG MattiSG merged commit 254220c into main May 9, 2025
5 checks passed
@MattiSG MattiSG deleted the spec branch May 9, 2025 14:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants