Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Breaking shape name resolution regarding menu shape #16585

Closed
sarahelsaig opened this issue Aug 20, 2024 · 6 comments · Fixed by #16623
Closed

Breaking shape name resolution regarding menu shape #16585

sarahelsaig opened this issue Aug 20, 2024 · 6 comments · Fixed by #16623
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@sarahelsaig
Copy link
Contributor

Describe the bug

I found this undocumented breaking change regarding the "menu" shape (potentially all non PascalCase shapes).

Orchard Core version

Latest main.

To Reproduce

  1. Set up an OC 2.0 site with any recipe that creates a main-menu content item (e.g. Blog).
  2. Create a content type with a Liquid part.
  3. Create a content item with the Liquid content {% shape "menu", alias: "alias:main-menu" %}
  4. Go to Admin > Design > Templates.
  5. Create a template called "Menu" with any content.
  6. Display the content item, observe that the shape is not overridden.
  7. Delete the "Menu" template and create a "menu" template instead.
  8. Display the content item again, observe that the shape is successfully overridden.
  9. Now do the same again in OC 1.8, observe that in 1.8 the menu shape is overridden by the "menu" template but not the "Menu" template, in other words it's the opposite.
override works menu Menu
OC 1.8
OC 2.0

Additional note: btw you can't create menu and Menu templates at the same time in Admin > Design > Templates. You have to delete one first to create the other. Is this intentional? Seems like the template creation is checked case-insensitively, but the template evaluation is case-sensitive.

Expected behavior

Either "Menu" template override should keep working. It would be even better if both "Menu" and "menu" worked. Maybe it should first try the shape type case sensitively and if it's not found then case insensitively? (that's what I do with media library themes in Lombiq.Hosting.MediaTheme here)

If that's not possible, then please document the breaking change in the 2.0.0.md release notes.

@sarahelsaig sarahelsaig mentioned this issue Aug 20, 2024
30 tasks
@MikeAlhayek MikeAlhayek added this to the 2.0 milestone Aug 20, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

We triaged this issue and set the milestone according to the priority we think is appropriate (see the docs on how we triage and prioritize issues).

This indicates when the core team may start working on it. However, if you'd like to contribute, we'd warmly welcome you to do that anytime. See our guide on contributions here.

@sebastienros
Copy link
Member

I personally would suggest it should work with all cases. That would also fix the breaking change.
If the solution is to be case sensitive then the solution would be to use the same case as the content type, which would also fix the breaking change.

@sebastienros
Copy link
Member

@sarahelsaig Looked at the linked PR and it seems that the issue is only for admin templates? That would reduce considerably the scope of the problem and help find out when it changed. That could also mean that it's store dependent: Linux vs Windows vs blob storage vs database.

@sarahelsaig
Copy link
Contributor Author

I agree, the problem is only for admin templates. I did some testing, and it looks like file templates in the Views folder (both cshtml and liquid) are resolved case-insensitively. Even on Linux, so that side is not filesystem dependent.

So I think it would be best if the admin templates get resolved case-insensitively as well. For consistency.

@sebastienros
Copy link
Member

I am surprised that admin templates are based on the filesystem, I thought we were storing them in database by default ... Or are they in a single "document" in the database and then it's not an issue with the filesystem but the way we search for them.

@sarahelsaig
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've investigated further and TemplatesDocument.Templates is already StringComparer.OrdinalIgnoreCase. But somehow this is not respected and the default generic comparer is used instead:
image

This is a problem when a model contains a dictionary with a setter, because STJ just creates a new dictionary with the default comparer instead of updating the existing setter with the provided values.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
3 participants