Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding some initial copyright and licensing information based on MIT's GPL release of ITS #264

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 16, 2016

Conversation

36bit
Copy link
Contributor

@36bit 36bit commented Dec 15, 2016

Adding some initial copyright and licensing information based on MIT's GPL release of ITS

@larsbrinkhoff
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

I'm looking at how GNU Emacs does this for its documentation. The files in doc/emacs have a line

@c See file emacs.texi for copying conditions.

and emacs.texi has the full statement. I would be nice to have something similar for the SYSDOC files. There could be a SYSDOC; GPL 3 file to which other files refer.

@larsbrinkhoff
Copy link
Member

doc/man/emacs.1.in starts with See section COPYING for copyright and redistribution information., and has the copyright statement last in the file.

@36bit
Copy link
Contributor Author

36bit commented Dec 15, 2016

Yes, the fundamental difference is having file-scope or centralized notices.

http://softwarefreedom.org/resources/2012/ManagingCopyrightInformation.html talks of it in the section "Comparing two systems: file-scope and centralized notices." Each has strengths and weaknesses as they describe.

I'll work on updating it to a more centralized method.

@larsbrinkhoff
Copy link
Member

Great, thanks! For documentation, is good if you don't have to scroll through a page or two of legal text when you start reading.

@36bit
Copy link
Contributor Author

36bit commented Dec 16, 2016

Okay, it has been restructured into something more centralized now and is ready for your review.

@larsbrinkhoff larsbrinkhoff merged commit 69f3840 into PDP-10:master Dec 16, 2016
@larsbrinkhoff
Copy link
Member

Thanks, merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants