Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for non-constant parameter overrides in condition table f… #94

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 4, 2019

Conversation

dweindl
Copy link
Member

@dweindl dweindl commented Apr 4, 2019

…or parameter_df creation (#94)

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Apr 4, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #94 into develop will increase coverage by 0.12%.
The diff coverage is 81.81%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop      #94      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    57.39%   57.51%   +0.12%     
===========================================
  Files            7        7              
  Lines          751      758       +7     
  Branches       165      167       +2     
===========================================
+ Hits           431      436       +5     
- Misses         291      293       +2     
  Partials        29       29
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
petab/core.py 74.7% <81.81%> (-0.07%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 37cb87a...276b02c. Read the comment docs.

condition_parameters = list(
set(condition_df.columns.values.tolist()) - {'conditionId',
'conditionName'})
for overridee in condition_parameters:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

kinda hard to read. can you add some docs?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hm. Line 910? Which part do you mean?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

in particular what this invert stuff does

@dweindl dweindl merged commit 86c669d into develop Apr 4, 2019
@dweindl dweindl deleted the fix_create_parameter_df branch April 4, 2019 18:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants