Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

xOffset for logscale xValues #17

Open
FFroehlich opened this issue Feb 21, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

xOffset for logscale xValues #17

FFroehlich opened this issue Feb 21, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
question Further information is requested visualization

Comments

@FFroehlich
Copy link
Collaborator

I feel like xOffset should be adapted to the scale that is employed, applying linear offsets on a logscale doesnt work well

simulation_and_data__cell_cycle_no_M_washout_ridge__AU565__LEE011_Ribociclib__lambda10.0.pdf
@FFroehlich FFroehlich changed the title xOffset for logscales measurements xOffset for logscale xValues Feb 21, 2020
@MerktSimon
Copy link
Member

you mean entries xScale=log10 and xOffset=5 should lead to a "real" offset of 10⁵?
Imo writing the linear value in either case would stay in consistency with e.g. the parameter table, where bounds are still written in linear values even if parameters live in log space.

@dweindl dweindl transferred this issue from PEtab-dev/PEtab Mar 18, 2021
@plakrisenko plakrisenko added question Further information is requested visualization labels Apr 27, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
question Further information is requested visualization
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@plakrisenko @FFroehlich @MerktSimon