-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
new feature: download all data by type #111
Comments
I could build this into its own function or class, however I think this could get redundant / confusing for users as this can actually already be done using the following commands:
|
yes, but this assumes that people understand (and care) about the shorthand dataset names. For deep learning, they just need to know what type of data it is, and how much there is. How about you rename you can add a
Do you have ad ocument describing the general users and use cases of the package? |
Okay will do. There is a general usage page in the docs but I haven't gotten a chance to update with the use cases - I'd like to directly link our tutorials to the docs but haven't had the time to do so yet. It takes quite a few extra steps with the CI blocked. |
Usage and use cases are not the same thing - use cases are the start of a design document that motivate the choices made in software development. Generally a good thing to have on hand to make detailed design decisions. |
I didn't know about that - I'll add that as an issue. |
No need, it's not really a thing that can be fixed in the code base, just something that'll need to be done ahead of the paper/pub. |
Shouldn't we keep track of if it as we will eventually need to add it to the docs? |
docs are for end users, they do not need to know how/why the software was designed as it was. Use cases/specifications are for developers so they can make informed implementation choices. I believe there are some github features to incorporate the full software engineering process, but i think that ship has sailed at this point :) |
It'd be nice to get ALL data of a particular data type (transcriptomics, proteomics, etc.) regardless of source. Can you add a function to do this? We can also filter by source after the fact.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: