Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] Downsampling through robin_set #360

Closed

Conversation

tizianoGuadagnino
Copy link
Collaborator

@tizianoGuadagnino tizianoGuadagnino commented Jul 9, 2024

This PR tries to maintain the classical behavior of our beloved VoxelDownsamplewhile taking what is good from #347, a.k.a. avoiding the double for loop over the LiDAR frame and hash table.

All the credit for this change goes to @l00p3. Once it is ready to merge (if), I will ensure you are between the contributors.

I will start the testing process today and come back to you, @nachovizzo @benemer feel free to be -Wpedantic

tizianoGuadagnino and others added 5 commits July 9, 2024 11:26
Make voxel computation consistent across all source code (PRBonn#354)
This reverts commit 3b7538f, reversing
changes made to 07f13d6.
behaviour to dont degraded the performences
@tizianoGuadagnino tizianoGuadagnino marked this pull request as draft July 9, 2024 10:36
@tizianoGuadagnino tizianoGuadagnino changed the title Downsampling through robin_set [WIP] Downsampling through robin_set Jul 9, 2024
@tizianoGuadagnino
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The difference in performances between the two versions is nothing, and I feel the code for the random sampling + robin_set is much more at the end, and it is not worth the space. We will keep the (modernized) original version (hopefully #362 ) and think about this later.

@nachovizzo nachovizzo added the voxelization All the topic related to voxelization utilities label Aug 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
voxelization All the topic related to voxelization utilities
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants