Customization Changes Edit

[ravishanigarapu]

📋 Description

JIRA ID: AMM-1006

Please provide a summary of the change and the motivation behind it. Include relevant context and details.

---

✅ Type of Change

• 🐞 Bug fix (non-breaking change which resolves an issue)
• ✨ New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• 🔥 Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• 🛠 Refactor (change that is neither a fix nor a new feature)
• ⚙️ Config change (configuration file or build script updates)
• 📚 Documentation (updates to docs or readme)
• 🧪 Tests (adding new or updating existing tests)
• 🎨 UI/UX (changes that affect the user interface)
• 🚀 Performance (improves performance)
• 🧹 Chore (miscellaneous changes that don't modify src or test files)

---

ℹ️ Additional Information

Please describe how the changes were tested, and include any relevant screenshots, logs, or other information that provides additional context.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes

  • Enhanced the update operation's robustness by adding null checks for sectionId and serviceProviderId.

• New Features

  • Continued support for updating various fields in the SectionAndFieldsMapping entity, ensuring valid data is applied.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The CustomizationServiceImpl class has been updated with enhancements to the updateSectionAndFields method. Key changes include the introduction of null checks for sectionId and serviceProviderId, ensuring these fields are validated before being set on the response object. The method retains its original structure and logic for updating other fields, while still returning a JSON response indicating the success of the update operation. No other methods or functionalities in the class have been modified.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
src/main/java/com/iemr/common/service/customization/...	Updated updateSectionAndFields method with null checks for sectionId and serviceProviderId.

Possibly related PRs

• logic modified save section-fields API #125: This PR modifies the updateSectionAndFields method in the CustomizationServiceImpl class, which is directly related to the changes made in the main PR that also focuses on the updateSectionAndFields method.
• Unnable to seperate fields for different providers #126: This PR enhances the saveSectionAndFields method in the CustomizationServiceImpl class, which is relevant as the main PR also includes modifications to the updateSectionAndFields method in the same class.

Suggested reviewers

• devikasuresh20
• helenKaryamsetty

Poem

In the code where rabbits hop,
Null checks added, no need to stop.
Fields now safe, they won’t go astray,
Updating sections in a clever way.
With each little change, we cheer and play! 🐇✨

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)

src/main/java/com/iemr/common/service/customization/CustomizationServiceImpl.java (1)

375-379: LGTM! Consider applying consistent null checks for all fields.

The addition of null checks for sectionId and serviceProviderId is a good improvement. It enhances the robustness of the update operation by ensuring that these fields are only updated when non-null values are provided.

For consistency, consider applying similar null checks to all other fields being updated in this method. This would provide a uniform approach to handling updates and further improve the method's resilience to potential null values.

Here's an example of how you could apply this pattern consistently:

 if (sectionAndFieldsMapping.getId() != null) {
     SectionAndFieldsMapping response = sectionAndFieldsMappingRepo.getById(sectionAndFieldsMapping.getId());
     if (response != null) {
         if(null != sectionAndFieldsMapping.getSectionId())
             response.setSectionId(sectionAndFieldsMapping.getSectionId());
         
         if(null != sectionAndFieldsMapping.getServiceProviderId())
             response.setServiceProviderId(sectionAndFieldsMapping.getServiceProviderId());
             
-        if (sectionAndFieldsMapping.getFieldName() != null)
+        if (null != sectionAndFieldsMapping.getFieldName())
             response.setFieldName(sectionAndFieldsMapping.getFieldName());
-        if (sectionAndFieldsMapping.getIsRequired() != null)
+        if (null != sectionAndFieldsMapping.getIsRequired())
             response.setIsRequired(sectionAndFieldsMapping.getIsRequired());
         // Apply similar changes to other fields...
     }
 }

This change would make the null checks consistent throughout the method, improving readability and maintainability.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between cba851d and bbe4fb5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/main/java/com/iemr/common/service/customization/CustomizationServiceImpl.java (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used