-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 45
AMM-1141 | Allocate API for allocating grievance records to agents #156
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
AMM-1141 | Allocate API for allocating grievance records to agents #156
Conversation
latest pull
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
AMM-1137 | after
latest pull
AMM-1076 and AMM-1078 (PSMRI#146)
latest pull 19 jan
latest pull
Warning Rate limit exceeded@srishtigrp78 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 5 minutes and 18 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new grievance allocation feature to the grievance handling system. Key changes include the addition of the Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant GrievanceController
participant GrievanceHandlingService
participant GrievanceDataRepo
Client->>GrievanceController: Request grievance allocation
GrievanceController->>GrievanceHandlingService: allocateGrievances(request)
GrievanceHandlingService->>GrievanceDataRepo: Find grievances by date/language
GrievanceDataRepo-->>GrievanceHandlingService: Return grievance list
GrievanceHandlingService->>GrievanceDataRepo: Allocate grievances to users
GrievanceHandlingService-->>GrievanceController: Return allocation summary
GrievanceController-->>Client: Response with allocation details
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (12)
src/main/java/com/iemr/common/service/grievance/GrievanceHandlingServiceImpl.java (3)
28-29
: Unused configuration parameter.
The fieldgrievanceAllocationRetryConfiguration
is declared but never used. Consider removing it or incorporating your retry logic to avoid confusion and maintain clarity.- @Value("${grievanceAllocationRetryConfiguration}") - private int grievanceAllocationRetryConfiguration;
42-44
: Use a custom exception type.
ThrowingException
is too generic and makes it difficult to distinguish between various error scenarios. A specific exception (e.g.,NoGrievancesFoundException
) or a Spring-specific variant (e.g.,ResponseStatusException
) would provide more clarity and maintainability.- throw new Exception("No grievances found in the given date range and language."); + throw new NoGrievancesFoundException("No grievances found in the given date range and language.");
76-78
: Consider returning a structured response.
Instead of returning a plain string status message, consider returning a JSON object or a standardized response DTO that can be parsed more reliably by clients.-return "Successfully allocated " + totalAllocated + " grievances to users."; +return new AllocationResponse("SUCCESS", totalAllocated).toJson();src/main/java/com/iemr/common/service/grievance/GrievanceHandlingService.java (2)
5-5
: Remove@Service
from the interface.
Typically,@Service
is applied to the implementing class, not the interface. Spring can autodetect the implementation class without this annotation on the interface.-@Service public interface GrievanceHandlingService {
7-7
: Use a domain-specific exception signature.
Relying onthrows Exception
is too broad. Consider throwing a dedicated, meaningful exception type to indicate allocation issues.-public String allocateGrievances(String request) throws Exception; +public String allocateGrievances(String request) throws NoGrievancesFoundException, SomeOtherCustomException;src/main/java/com/iemr/common/repository/grievance/GrievanceDataRepo.java (2)
28-32
: Ensure proper indexing for date-range queries.
Querying bycreatedDate
can be expensive if there's no supporting index. Consider verifying or adding an index to improve performance for large datasets.
41-42
: Use a type-safe return instead ofArrayList<Object[]>
.
Returning raw arrays reduces readability and maintainability. Consider mapping the results to a DTO or an entity for stronger type safety.- public ArrayList<Object[]> getBeneficiaryGrievanceDetails(@Param("benRegId") Long benRegId); + public List<BeneficiaryGrievanceDTO> getBeneficiaryGrievanceDetails(@Param("benRegId") Long benRegId);src/main/java/com/iemr/common/data/grievance/GrievanceAllocationRequest.java (2)
9-13
: Consider renaminguserID
touserIds
for clarity.
Using plural naming clarifies that this field holds multiple user IDs.- private List<Integer> userID; + private List<Integer> userIds;
56-65
: EnhancetoString()
for null safety or unified formatting.
Consider adding null checks or formatting for fields that might benull
. This ensures a more robust debug output.src/main/java/com/iemr/common/controller/grievance/GrievanceController.java (2)
18-19
: Consider using strongly typed request objects instead of raw JSON strings.
Deserialization via a DTO (e.g.,GrievanceAllocationRequest
) can simplify validation and reduce parsing errors.- public String allocateGrievances(@RequestBody String request) + public String allocateGrievances(@RequestBody GrievanceAllocationRequest requestDto)
75-83
: Add specific exception handling or error messages as needed.
For improved debuggability, consider returning details on which input is invalid (date range, user ID, language, etc.) when an exception is thrown.src/main/java/com/iemr/common/data/grievance/GrievanceDetails.java (1)
339-353
: Add constraints or validations onpreferredLanguageId
andpreferredLanguage
.
Enforcing not-null or checking valid language codes helps prevent invalid DB entries.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
src/main/java/com/iemr/common/controller/grievance/GrievanceController.java
(4 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/common/data/grievance/GrievanceAllocationRequest.java
(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/common/data/grievance/GrievanceDetails.java
(4 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/common/repository/grievance/GrievanceDataRepo.java
(2 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/common/service/grievance/GrievanceDataSyncImpl.java
(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/common/service/grievance/GrievanceHandlingService.java
(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/common/service/grievance/GrievanceHandlingServiceImpl.java
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: style-check / checkstyle
- GitHub Check: Analyze (java)
- GitHub Check: Build
- GitHub Check: Package-test
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/main/java/com/iemr/common/repository/grievance/GrievanceDataRepo.java (1)
35-38
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd allocation timestamp or concurrency checks.
Currently, onlyisAllocated
anduserid
are updated. If there's any auditing or concurrency requirement, consider also storing an allocation timestamp and verifying no concurrent allocation is happening.Would you like me to generate a script to search for concurrency checks or existing locking mechanisms in the codebase?
src/main/java/com/iemr/common/data/grievance/GrievanceAllocationRequest.java (1)
9-10
: Validate date ranges and/or consider time zone implications.
When handling date/time filtering, ensure thestartDate
is beforeendDate
and confirm ifLocalDateTime
is sufficient or ifZonedDateTime
/OffsetDateTime
is needed for time zone handling.Also applies to: 16-30
src/main/java/com/iemr/common/controller/grievance/GrievanceController.java (2)
5-5
: InjectingGrievanceHandlingService
looks correct.
No major issues noted here. Code is clear and follows Spring conventions for dependency injection.Also applies to: 30-36
67-71
: Evaluate usage ofio.lettuce.core.dynamic.annotation.Param
.
This annotation might not be intended for standard Spring MVC practice. Spring typically uses@RequestParam
(for query parameters) or avoids param annotation for JSON bodies. Confirm that this is the correct annotation for documenting your JSON fields.src/main/java/com/iemr/common/data/grievance/GrievanceDetails.java (1)
100-106
: Ensure consistency betweenpreferredLanguageId
andpreferredLanguage
.
When both are present, ensure you maintain consistent usage (e.g., if storing a language code inpreferredLanguageId
, keep it updated withpreferredLanguage
). Potentially consider a single field if the ID is always mapped to a string.Also applies to: 163-163, 185-186
src/main/java/com/iemr/common/service/grievance/GrievanceDataSyncImpl.java (1)
222-237
: Confirm non-empty arrays before setting additional fields.
Ensure there's no case wherelist1
could be empty, and handle potential null returns fromgrievanceDataRepo.getBeneficiaryGrievanceDetails(...)
.
for (int i = 0; i < grievances.size(); i++) { | ||
if (i % allocateNo == 0 && userIndex < userIds.size()) { | ||
// Allocate to the next user when reaching the allocateNo threshold | ||
Integer userId = userIds.get(userIndex); | ||
GrievanceDetails grievance = grievances.get(i); | ||
|
||
// Call the repository method to allocate the grievance to the user | ||
int rowsAffected = grievanceDataRepo.allocateGrievance(grievance.getGrievanceId(), userId); | ||
|
||
if (rowsAffected > 0) { | ||
totalAllocated++; | ||
logger.debug("Allocated grievance ID " + grievance.getGrievanceId() + " to user ID " + userId); | ||
} else { | ||
logger.error("Failed to allocate grievance ID " + grievance.getGrievanceId() + " to user ID " + userId); | ||
} | ||
|
||
userIndex = (userIndex + 1) % userIds.size(); | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Allocation logic does not allocate the intended number of grievances per user.
Currently, the condition if (i % allocateNo == 0)
means only one grievance per user is being allocated for every block of allocateNo
items. If the goal is to allocate allocateNo
grievances consecutively to each user, consider the following revision:
-for (int i = 0; i < grievances.size(); i++) {
- if (i % allocateNo == 0 && userIndex < userIds.size()) {
- // ...
- userIndex = (userIndex + 1) % userIds.size();
- }
+for (int i = 0; i < grievances.size(); i++) {
+ Integer userId = userIds.get(userIndex);
+ GrievanceDetails grievance = grievances.get(i);
+
+ int rowsAffected = grievanceDataRepo.allocateGrievance(grievance.getGrievanceId(), userId);
+ if (rowsAffected > 0) {
+ totalAllocated++;
+ logger.debug("Allocated grievance ID " + grievance.getGrievanceId() + " to user ID " + userId);
+ } else {
+ logger.error("Failed to allocate grievance ID " + grievance.getGrievanceId() + " to user ID " + userId);
+ }
+
+ // Move to the next user after allocateNo grievances
+ if ((i + 1) % allocateNo == 0) {
+ userIndex = (userIndex + 1) % userIds.size();
+ }
}
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
for (int i = 0; i < grievances.size(); i++) { | |
if (i % allocateNo == 0 && userIndex < userIds.size()) { | |
// Allocate to the next user when reaching the allocateNo threshold | |
Integer userId = userIds.get(userIndex); | |
GrievanceDetails grievance = grievances.get(i); | |
// Call the repository method to allocate the grievance to the user | |
int rowsAffected = grievanceDataRepo.allocateGrievance(grievance.getGrievanceId(), userId); | |
if (rowsAffected > 0) { | |
totalAllocated++; | |
logger.debug("Allocated grievance ID " + grievance.getGrievanceId() + " to user ID " + userId); | |
} else { | |
logger.error("Failed to allocate grievance ID " + grievance.getGrievanceId() + " to user ID " + userId); | |
} | |
userIndex = (userIndex + 1) % userIds.size(); | |
} | |
} | |
for (int i = 0; i < grievances.size(); i++) { | |
Integer userId = userIds.get(userIndex); | |
GrievanceDetails grievance = grievances.get(i); | |
int rowsAffected = grievanceDataRepo.allocateGrievance(grievance.getGrievanceId(), userId); | |
if (rowsAffected > 0) { | |
totalAllocated++; | |
logger.debug("Allocated grievance ID " + grievance.getGrievanceId() + " to user ID " + userId); | |
} else { | |
logger.error("Failed to allocate grievance ID " + grievance.getGrievanceId() + " to user ID " + userId); | |
} | |
// Move to the next user after allocateNo grievances | |
if ((i + 1) % allocateNo == 0) { | |
userIndex = (userIndex + 1) % userIds.size(); | |
} | |
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@srishtigrp78 Great! Thank you for fixing the allocation logic. 🎉
If you found this review helpful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on X?
Thank you for using CodeRabbit!
if (objects != null && objects.length <= 5) { | ||
grievance.setPreferredLanguageId((Integer) objects[0]); | ||
grievance.setPreferredLanguage((String) objects[1]); | ||
grievance.setVanSerialNo((Integer) objects[2]); | ||
grievance.setVanId((Integer) objects[3]); | ||
grievance.setParkingPlaceId((Integer) objects[4]); | ||
grievance.setVehicalNo((String) objects[5]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Change objects.length <= 5
to objects.length >= 6
to avoid index out of bounds.
Right now, retrieving objects[5]
is unsafe if length
is only 5.
- if (objects != null && objects.length <= 5) {
+ if (objects != null && objects.length >= 6) {
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
if (objects != null && objects.length <= 5) { | |
grievance.setPreferredLanguageId((Integer) objects[0]); | |
grievance.setPreferredLanguage((String) objects[1]); | |
grievance.setVanSerialNo((Integer) objects[2]); | |
grievance.setVanId((Integer) objects[3]); | |
grievance.setParkingPlaceId((Integer) objects[4]); | |
grievance.setVehicalNo((String) objects[5]); | |
if (objects != null && objects.length >= 6) { | |
grievance.setPreferredLanguageId((Integer) objects[0]); | |
grievance.setPreferredLanguage((String) objects[1]); | |
grievance.setVanSerialNo((Integer) objects[2]); | |
grievance.setVanId((Integer) objects[3]); | |
grievance.setParkingPlaceId((Integer) objects[4]); | |
grievance.setVehicalNo((String) objects[5]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@srishtigrp78 Great! Thank you for fixing the array length check. This will help prevent any potential index out of bounds issues.
(\ /)
(^.^)
c(")(")
If you found this review helpful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on X?
Thank you for using CodeRabbit!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
src/main/java/com/iemr/common/service/grievance/GrievanceHandlingServiceImpl.java (5)
23-23
: Fix logger initialization to use correct class.The logger is initialized with
GrievanceHandlingService.class
instead ofGrievanceHandlingServiceImpl.class
. This could cause confusion when reading logs as they would show the interface name rather than the implementing class.-private Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(GrievanceHandlingService.class); +private Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(GrievanceHandlingServiceImpl.class);
31-31
: Consider using dependency injection for InputMapper.Direct instantiation of
InputMapper
bypasses Spring's dependency management. Consider making it a Spring-managed bean and using dependency injection.-private InputMapper inputMapper = new InputMapper(); +@Autowired +private InputMapper inputMapper;Then create a configuration class:
@Configuration public class MapperConfig { @Bean public InputMapper inputMapper() { return new InputMapper(); } }
26-26
: Remove redundant comments.The comments on lines 26 and 29 are redundant as they merely restate what is already clear from the code. Consider removing them or replacing with more meaningful documentation that explains the "why" rather than the "what".
Also applies to: 29-29
61-66
: Adjust logging levels for production environment.Using debug level logging for every successful allocation might be too verbose for production. Consider:
- Moving successful allocation logging to TRACE level
- Including more context in error logs
if (rowsAffected > 0) { totalAllocated++; - logger.debug("Allocated grievance ID " + grievance.getGrievanceId() + " to user ID " + userId); + logger.trace("Allocated grievance ID {} to user ID {}", grievance.getGrievanceId(), userId); } else { - logger.error("Failed to allocate grievance ID " + grievance.getGrievanceId() + " to user ID " + userId); + logger.error("Failed to allocate grievance ID {} to user ID {}. Database update returned 0 rows affected", + grievance.getGrievanceId(), userId); }
74-75
: Enhance the return message with more details.The current success message only includes the total number of allocations. Consider including more useful information such as the number of failed allocations and the date range.
-return "Successfully allocated " + totalAllocated + " grievances to users."; +return String.format("Allocated %d out of %d grievances to %d users for date range %s to %s", + totalAllocated, grievances.size(), userIds.size(), + allocationRequest.getStartDate(), allocationRequest.getEndDate());
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/main/java/com/iemr/common/service/grievance/GrievanceDataSyncImpl.java
(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/common/service/grievance/GrievanceHandlingServiceImpl.java
(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/main/java/com/iemr/common/service/grievance/GrievanceDataSyncImpl.java
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: Package-test
- GitHub Check: Analyze (java)
- GitHub Check: Build
public String allocateGrievances(String request) throws Exception { | ||
// Step 1: Parse the request string into the appropriate GrievanceAllocationRequest object | ||
GrievanceAllocationRequest allocationRequest = inputMapper.gson().fromJson(request, GrievanceAllocationRequest.class); | ||
|
||
// Step 2: Fetch grievances based on the start date, end date range, and language | ||
List<GrievanceDetails> grievances = grievanceDataRepo.findGrievancesInDateRangeAndLanguage( | ||
allocationRequest.getStartDate(), allocationRequest.getEndDate(), allocationRequest.getLanguage()); | ||
|
||
if (grievances.isEmpty()) { | ||
throw new Exception("No grievances found in the given date range and language."); | ||
} | ||
|
||
// Step 3: Sort grievances in ascending order based on creation date | ||
grievances.sort(Comparator.comparing(GrievanceDetails::getCreatedDate)); | ||
|
||
// Step 4: Get the allocation parameters from the request | ||
int totalAllocated = 0; | ||
int userIndex = 0; | ||
List<Integer> userIds = allocationRequest.getUserID(); | ||
int allocateNo = allocationRequest.getAllocateNo(); // Number of grievances to allocate per user | ||
|
||
|
||
for (int i = 0; i < grievances.size(); i++) { | ||
Integer userId = userIds.get(userIndex); | ||
GrievanceDetails grievance = grievances.get(i); | ||
|
||
int rowsAffected = grievanceDataRepo.allocateGrievance(grievance.getGrievanceId(), userId); | ||
if (rowsAffected > 0) { | ||
totalAllocated++; | ||
logger.debug("Allocated grievance ID " + grievance.getGrievanceId() + " to user ID " + userId); | ||
} else { | ||
logger.error("Failed to allocate grievance ID " + grievance.getGrievanceId() + " to user ID " + userId); | ||
} | ||
|
||
// Move to the next user after allocateNo grievances | ||
if ((i + 1) % allocateNo == 0) { | ||
userIndex = (userIndex + 1) % userIds.size(); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
// Step 6: Return a message with the total number of grievances allocated | ||
return "Successfully allocated " + totalAllocated + " grievances to users."; | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add transaction management and improve error handling.
The method performs multiple database operations but lacks transaction management. Additionally, several edge cases are not handled:
- Missing @transactional annotation
- No validation for empty userIds list
- No validation for allocateNo being positive
- Retry configuration is defined but not utilized
Consider applying these improvements:
+@Transactional
public String allocateGrievances(String request) throws Exception {
// Step 1: Parse the request string into the appropriate GrievanceAllocationRequest object
GrievanceAllocationRequest allocationRequest = inputMapper.gson().fromJson(request, GrievanceAllocationRequest.class);
+
+ // Validate input
+ if (allocationRequest.getUserID() == null || allocationRequest.getUserID().isEmpty()) {
+ throw new IllegalArgumentException("User IDs list cannot be empty");
+ }
+ if (allocationRequest.getAllocateNo() <= 0) {
+ throw new IllegalArgumentException("Allocation number must be positive");
+ }
Also, consider implementing retry logic using the defined grievanceAllocationRetryConfiguration
:
@Retryable(
value = { SQLException.class },
maxAttempts = "${grievanceAllocationRetryConfiguration}",
backoff = @Backoff(delay = 1000))
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems like the humans are having a chat. I'll hop back into my burrow for now. If you need me again, just tag @coderabbitai in a new comment, and I'll come hopping out!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/main/java/com/iemr/common/controller/grievance/GrievanceController.java (1)
74-82
: Improve error handling with specific exception types.The current catch block catches all exceptions generically. Consider handling specific exceptions separately for better error reporting.
try { response.setResponse(grievanceHandlingService.allocateGrievances(request)); -} catch (Exception e) { +} catch (InvalidRequestException e) { + logger.error("Invalid request parameters: " + e.getMessage(), e); + response.setError(e); + return ResponseEntity.badRequest().body(response); +} catch (GrievanceAllocationException e) { + logger.error("Grievance allocation failed: " + e.getMessage(), e); + response.setError(e); + return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR).body(response); +} catch (Exception e) { logger.error("Grievance allocation failed with error: " + e.getMessage(), e); response.setError(e); + return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR).body(response); } -return response.toString(); +return ResponseEntity.ok(response);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/main/java/com/iemr/common/controller/grievance/GrievanceController.java
(4 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/common/service/grievance/GrievanceHandlingServiceImpl.java
(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/main/java/com/iemr/common/service/grievance/GrievanceHandlingServiceImpl.java
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: Package-test
- GitHub Check: Analyze (java)
- GitHub Check: Build
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/main/java/com/iemr/common/controller/grievance/GrievanceController.java (2)
29-36
: LGTM! Well-structured dependency injection.The addition of the new service follows best practices with proper constructor injection and final field declaration.
65-83
: Verify the new endpoint with integration tests.Please ensure that integration tests are added to cover:
- Successful allocation scenarios
- Invalid request handling
- Error scenarios
- Edge cases with date ranges and languages
Would you like me to help generate the test cases?
import com.iemr.common.utils.exception.IEMRException; | ||
import com.iemr.common.utils.response.OutputResponse; | ||
|
||
import io.lettuce.core.dynamic.annotation.Param; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Replace lettuce.core @param with OpenAPI @parameter annotation.
The @Param
annotation from io.lettuce.core
is intended for Redis operations, not API documentation. Since you're using OpenAPI/Swagger for documentation, use @Parameter
from io.swagger.v3.oas.annotations
instead.
-import io.lettuce.core.dynamic.annotation.Param;
+import io.swagger.v3.oas.annotations.Parameter;
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
import io.lettuce.core.dynamic.annotation.Param; | |
import io.swagger.v3.oas.annotations.Parameter; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not required
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems like the humans are having a chat. I'll hop back into my burrow for now. If you need me again, just tag @coderabbitai in a new comment, and I'll come hopping out!
@Operation(summary = "Allocate grievances to users") | ||
@PostMapping(value = "/allocateGrievances", consumes = MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON, produces = MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON, headers = "Authorization") | ||
public String allocateGrievances(@Param(value = "{\"startDate\":\"ISO-8601 format start date (e.g., 2022-12-01T07:49:00.000Z)\", " | ||
+ "\"endDate\":\"ISO-8601 format end date (e.g., 2025-01-16T07:49:30.561)\", " | ||
+ "\"userID\":\"Array list of User IDs (agents to be allocated grievances)\", " | ||
+ "\"allocateNo\":\"Integer - number of grievances to be allocated to each user\"," | ||
+ "\"language\":\"String - language to filter grievances by\"}") | ||
|
||
@RequestBody String request) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance API documentation and request validation.
The endpoint documentation needs improvement:
- Replace the @param annotation with proper OpenAPI annotations
- Add response documentation
- Add explicit request validation
@Operation(summary = "Allocate grievances to users")
+@ApiResponse(responseCode = "200", description = "Grievances allocated successfully")
+@ApiResponse(responseCode = "400", description = "Invalid request parameters")
+@ApiResponse(responseCode = "500", description = "Internal server error")
@PostMapping(value = "/allocateGrievances", consumes = MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON, produces = MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON, headers = "Authorization")
-public String allocateGrievances(@Param(value = "{\"startDate\":\"ISO-8601 format start date (e.g., 2022-12-01T07:49:00.000Z)\", "
- + "\"endDate\":\"ISO-8601 format end date (e.g., 2025-01-16T07:49:30.561)\", "
- + "\"userID\":\"Array list of User IDs (agents to be allocated grievances)\", "
- + "\"allocateNo\":\"Integer - number of grievances to be allocated to each user\","
- + "\"language\":\"String - language to filter grievances by\"}")
- @RequestBody String request)
+public ResponseEntity<OutputResponse> allocateGrievances(
+ @Parameter(description = "Start date in ISO-8601 format", required = true)
+ @RequestBody @Valid GrievanceAllocationRequest request)
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not required
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems like the humans are having a chat. I'll hop back into my burrow for now. If you need me again, just tag @coderabbitai in a new comment, and I'll come hopping out!
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks fine
📋 Description
JIRA ID: 1141
Allocate API for allocating grievance records to agents on the basis of start date, end date, allocate no, and language.
Please provide a summary of the change and the motivation behind it. Include relevant context and details.
✅ Type of Change
ℹ️ Additional Information
Please describe how the changes were tested, and include any relevant screenshots, logs, or other information that provides additional context.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
Technical Updates
The update provides more flexible grievance management capabilities, allowing for more precise allocation and tracking of grievance details.