Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggestion to make the pull request template more "concise" #20573

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 16, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
36 changes: 24 additions & 12 deletions .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,17 +1,29 @@
Please use [PX4 Discuss](http://discuss.px4.io/) or [Discord](https://discord.gg/dronecode) to align on pull requests if necessary. You can then open draft pull requests to get early feedback.
<!--

## Describe problem solved by this pull request
A clear and concise description of the problem this proposed change will solve. Or, what it will improve.
E.g. For this use case I ran into...
Thank you for your contribution!

## Describe your solution
A clear and concise description of what you have implemented.
Get early feedback through
- Dronecode Discord: https://discord.gg/dronecode
- PX4 Discuss: http://discuss.px4.io/
- opening a draft pr and sharing the link

## Describe possible alternatives
A clear and concise description of alternative solutions or features you've considered.
-->
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We could add something like this: (anything that reminds users to upload the ULog!! As daniel said during the dev call.

If you have a log, make sure to upload it to https://review.px4.io/ (it accelerates review / feedback process)


## Test data / coverage
How was it tested? What cases were covered? Logs uploaded to https://review.px4.io/ and screenshots of the important plot parts.
### Solved Problem
When ... I found that ...

## Additional context
Add any other related context or media.
Fixes #{Github issue ID}

### Solution
- Add ... for ...
- Refactor ...

### Alternatives
We could also ...

### Test coverage
- Unit/integration test: ...
- Simulation/hardware testing logs: https://review.px4.io/

### Context
Related links, screenshot before/after, video