[Sentry] fix pagination #14727
[Sentry] fix pagination #14727
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThe pull request includes updates to the version numbers of several Sentry-related components, incrementing them from "0.1.0" to "0.1.1" or "0.1.2" as applicable. The changes affect the actions for listing issue events, project events, project issues, and updating issues, as well as the Sentry package itself. Additionally, a modification was made to the pagination logic in the Sentry app component to improve robustness. No other structural or functional changes were made to the components. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
components/sentry/sentry.app.mjs (1)
Line range hint
175-179: Consider adding error handling for missing nextPage objectWhile the string comparison is now more robust, the code assumes
prevContext.nextPageexists. Consider adding a null check to prevent potential runtime errors.- } else if (String(prevContext.nextPage.results).toLowerCase() === "true") { + } else if (prevContext?.nextPage?.results && String(prevContext.nextPage.results).toLowerCase() === "true") {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
components/sentry/actions/list-issue-events/list-issue-events.mjs(1 hunks)components/sentry/actions/list-project-events/list-project-events.mjs(1 hunks)components/sentry/actions/list-project-issues/list-project-issues.mjs(1 hunks)components/sentry/actions/update-issue/update-issue.mjs(1 hunks)components/sentry/package.json(1 hunks)components/sentry/sentry.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/sentry/sources/issue-event/issue-event.mjs(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
- components/sentry/actions/list-issue-events/list-issue-events.mjs
- components/sentry/actions/list-project-events/list-project-events.mjs
- components/sentry/actions/list-project-issues/list-project-issues.mjs
- components/sentry/actions/update-issue/update-issue.mjs
- components/sentry/package.json
- components/sentry/sources/issue-event/issue-event.mjs
🔇 Additional comments (2)
components/sentry/sentry.app.mjs (2)
175-175: Approve the defensive programming approach
The change adds robustness to handle the results field as both string and boolean, which is a good defensive programming practice against potential API changes.
Line range hint 172-191: Verify pagination behavior across all Sentry API endpoints
The pagination logic modification appears in a shared method used by multiple prop definitions. Let's verify this change works consistently across all endpoints.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the pagination implementation to ensure it works consistently across all endpoints.
Let me check one final aspect to verify how the pagination data is processed from the API response.
Pagination behavior is consistently implemented across Sentry API endpoints
The pagination logic in _propDefinitionsOptions is correctly implemented and works consistently across all endpoints because:
- The method is used by both organization and issue prop definitions
- It properly handles the Link header pagination from Sentry's API responses
- The pagination state is correctly maintained through the
nextPagecontext - The boolean string handling (
String(prevContext.nextPage.results).toLowerCase() === "true") is a defensive measure that maintains compatibility if Sentry changes their API response format
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all usages of _propDefinitionsOptions to ensure consistent pagination behavior
# Search for direct calls to _propDefinitionsOptions
echo "Direct calls to _propDefinitionsOptions:"
ast-grep --pattern 'await this._propDefinitionsOptions($$$)'
# Search for prop definitions that might use pagination
echo "\nProp definitions that might use pagination:"
rg -A 5 'async options.*\(' components/sentry/
Length of output: 2828
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of _propDefinitionsOptions and pagination-related code
echo "Checking _propDefinitionsOptions implementation:"
rg -A 20 "_propDefinitionsOptions.*\(" components/sentry/
# Check if there are any other pagination-related implementations
echo "\nChecking other pagination implementations:"
rg -A 10 "nextPage|pagination" components/sentry/
Length of output: 6515
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check how the pagination data is extracted from API responses
echo "Checking pagination data extraction:"
rg -B 5 -A 15 "const.*next.*=" components/sentry/
# Check for any pagination-related HTTP response processing
echo "\nChecking HTTP response processing:"
rg -B 5 -A 10 "headers.*link" components/sentry/
Length of output: 3220
WHY
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores