Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test cubBayes algos for vectorized input output #305

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 26, 2022

Conversation

jagadeesr
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 26, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #305 (e10142b) into develop (8b4e886) will increase coverage by 0.27%.
The diff coverage is 98.97%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #305      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    88.15%   88.43%   +0.27%     
===========================================
  Files           89       90       +1     
  Lines         4281     4375      +94     
===========================================
+ Hits          3774     3869      +95     
+ Misses         507      506       -1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...mcpy/stopping_criterion/cub_qmc_bayes_lattice_g.py 60.21% <ø> (ø)
qmcpy/stopping_criterion/cub_qmc_bayes_net_g.py 74.22% <ø> (ø)
setup.py 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
qmcpy/accumulate_data/ld_transform_bayes_data.py 75.34% <100.00%> (+0.68%) ⬆️
qmcpy/stopping_criterion/_cub_bayes_ld_g.py 86.06% <100.00%> (ø)
test/longtests/test_cubbayes_vec.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
qmcpy/util/exceptions_warnings.py 82.35% <0.00%> (-5.89%) ⬇️
qmcpy/util/abstraction_functions.py 97.56% <0.00%> (+2.43%) ⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@alegresor alegresor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great @jagadeesr!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants