Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix evolved operator ansatz (backport #11682) #11965

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 7, 2024

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Mar 7, 2024

This is an automatic backport of pull request #11682 done by Mergify.


Mergify commands and options

More conditions and actions can be found in the documentation.

You can also trigger Mergify actions by commenting on this pull request:

  • @Mergifyio refresh will re-evaluate the rules
  • @Mergifyio rebase will rebase this PR on its base branch
  • @Mergifyio update will merge the base branch into this PR
  • @Mergifyio backport <destination> will backport this PR on <destination> branch

Additionally, on Mergify dashboard you can:

  • look at your merge queues
  • generate the Mergify configuration with the config editor.

Finally, you can contact us on https://mergify.com

* Fix handling of empty operators list in EvolvedOperatorAnsatz

* Add test for empty operator list in EvolvedOperatorAnsatz

* add release note for fixing evolved operator ansatz

* Update releasenotes/notes/fix-evolved-operator-ansatz-empty-ops-bf8ecfae8f1e1001.yaml

Co-authored-by: Julien Gacon <gaconju@gmail.com>

* add a note to fix-evolved-operator-ansatz-empty-ops-bf8ecfae8f1e1001.yaml

* Update fix-evolved-operator-ansatz-empty-ops-bf8ecfae8f1e1001.yaml

* merge two conditions in evolved_operator_ansatz

Co-authored-by: Julien Gacon <gaconju@gmail.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Julien Gacon <gaconju@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 8b6e4fe)
@mergify mergify bot requested a review from a team as a code owner March 7, 2024 15:24
@qiskit-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you for opening a new pull request.

Before your PR can be merged it will first need to pass continuous integration tests and be reviewed. Sometimes the review process can be slow, so please be patient.

While you're waiting, please feel free to review other open PRs. While only a subset of people are authorized to approve pull requests for merging, everyone is encouraged to review open pull requests. Doing reviews helps reduce the burden on the core team and helps make the project's code better for everyone.

One or more of the the following people are requested to review this:

  • @Cryoris
  • @Qiskit/terra-core
  • @ajavadia

@github-actions github-actions bot added Changelog: Bugfix Include in the "Fixed" section of the changelog Community PR PRs from contributors that are not 'members' of the Qiskit repo labels Mar 7, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 1.0.2 milestone Mar 7, 2024
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 8190603690

Details

  • 6 of 6 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • 1 unchanged line in 1 file lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.02%) to 89.294%

Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
crates/qasm2/src/lex.rs 1 92.7%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 8190487805: 0.02%
Covered Lines: 58917
Relevant Lines: 65981

💛 - Coveralls

@kevinhartman kevinhartman added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 7, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to no response for status checks Mar 7, 2024
@kevinhartman kevinhartman added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 7, 2024
Merged via the queue into stable/1.0 with commit 810ea44 Mar 7, 2024
14 checks passed
@mergify mergify bot deleted the mergify/bp/stable/1.0/pr-11682 branch March 7, 2024 18:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Changelog: Bugfix Include in the "Fixed" section of the changelog Community PR PRs from contributors that are not 'members' of the Qiskit repo
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants