Skip to content

Conversation

gabhijit-izel
Copy link
Contributor

@gabhijit-izel gabhijit-izel commented Oct 14, 2016

Description

Fixing a bunch of minor issues -

  1. Image ID is taken as App attribute (not image name)
  2. Quali Network UUID is taken as CP attribute (no longer hard coded)
  3. Unwanted attributes are removed.

Related Stories

#25 #26 #27 #35

Breaking

Yes | NO :

Not sure. Previous data model will not work now. So one needs to start with a new database. This is not released yet, so not a big problem, but something dev/QA should keep in mind.

Breaking changes

  • Breaking change description

    Detailed change info
    Migration steps

This change is Reviewable

- Updated datamodel.xml
- Now taking Quali Network Net ID
- removed unused attributes
- Unit tests are now passing.
- Quickly ran all unit tests.
- Tested deploying instance with
 1) Taking Image ID instead of Image Name
 2) Taking Quali network ID as a CP Attribute
 3) Basic Unit tests passing
…hell into feature/gabhijit-izel_25_26_27_revisit_attributes
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.1%) to 95.036% when pulling c9bc0d0 on feature/gabhijit-izel_25_26_27_revisit_attributes into 87cc01c on develop.

@alexazarh
Copy link
Contributor

Reviewed 13 of 13 files at r1.
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 1 unresolved discussion, some commit checks failed.


package/cloudshell/cp/openstack/command/operations/deploy_operation.py, line 24 at r1 (raw file):

        :param ReservationModel reservation:
        :param DeployDataHolder deploy_req_model:
        :param XXX cp_resource_model:

Is the "XXX" a type?


Comments from Reviewable

Fixed one review comment
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.1%) to 95.036% when pulling f572970 on feature/gabhijit-izel_25_26_27_revisit_attributes into 87cc01c on develop.

@gabhijit-izel
Copy link
Contributor Author

Review status: 12 of 13 files reviewed at latest revision, 1 unresolved discussion.


package/cloudshell/cp/openstack/command/operations/deploy_operation.py, line 24 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, alexazarh wrote…

Is the "XXX" a type?

Fixed

Comments from Reviewable

@alexazarh
Copy link
Contributor

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r2.
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, all discussions resolved.


Comments from Reviewable

@alexazarh alexazarh merged commit 70c5301 into develop Nov 1, 2016
@gabhijit-izel gabhijit-izel deleted the feature/gabhijit-izel_25_26_27_revisit_attributes branch December 26, 2016 14:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants