Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: Add debouncer recipe to cookbook #5968

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 7, 2024

Conversation

n8sabes
Copy link
Contributor

@n8sabes n8sabes commented Mar 7, 2024

Overview

What is it?

  • Feature / enhancement
  • Bug
  • [√] Docs / tests / types / typos

Description

Add denouncer recipe to the cookbook

Use cases and why

Writing a debouncer in Qwik does not follow the standard patterns used in other frameworks and results in unnecessary developer effort to figure it out.

Checklist:

  • [√] My code follows the developer guidelines of this project
  • [√] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • [√] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • Added new tests to cover the fix / functionality

Special thanks to @KenAKAFrosty.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 7, 2024

👷 Deploy request for qwik-insights pending review.

Visit the deploys page to approve it

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 497e069

@n8sabes n8sabes changed the title Add debouncer recipe to cookbook docs: Add debouncer recipe to cookbook Mar 7, 2024
Copy link
Member

@gioboa gioboa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @n8sabes great PR

Copy link
Member

@wmertens wmertens left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@wmertens wmertens merged commit fcf1b0c into QwikDev:main Mar 7, 2024
22 of 23 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants