Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: (qwikcity/api) removed we; improved sentence structure #6520

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 11, 2024

Conversation

sajebehari
Copy link
Contributor

Overview

What is it?

  • Feature / enhancement
  • Bug
  • Docs / tests / types / typos

Description

Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed. Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change.

Use cases and why

    1. One use case
    1. Another use case

Checklist:

  • My code follows the developer guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • Added new tests to cover the fix / functionality

@sajebehari sajebehari requested review from a team as code owners June 11, 2024 21:16
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jun 11, 2024

👷 Deploy request for qwik-insights pending review.

Visit the deploys page to approve it

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit d5b3d35

Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Jun 11, 2024

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

@builder.io/qwik (d5b3d35)

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@builder.io/qwik@6520

@builder.io/qwik-city (d5b3d35)

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@builder.io/qwik-city@6520

eslint-plugin-qwik (d5b3d35)

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/eslint-plugin-qwik@6520

create-qwik (d5b3d35)

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/create-qwik@6520

@gioboa gioboa merged commit 62dbfe9 into QwikDev:main Jun 11, 2024
20 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants