We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
As reported by @deepayan (in reference to Modules but breaks in even simpler cases).
Example:
edd@don:/tmp$ R -e 'Rcpp::Rcpp.package.skeleton("with.dot")' edd@don:/tmp$ R CMD build with.dot edd@don:/tmp$ R CMD check with.dot_1.0.tar.gz
which ends in
edd@don:/tmp$ cat /tmp/with.dot.Rcheck/00install.out * installing *source* package ‘with.dot’ ... ** libs ccache g++ -I/usr/share/R/include -DNDEBUG -I"/usr/local/lib/R/site-library/Rcpp/include" -fpic -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -O3 -Wall -pipe -Wno-unused -pedantic -c RcppExports.cpp -o RcppExports.o RcppExports.cpp:10:21: error: expected initializer before ‘.’ token RcppExport SEXP with.dot_rcpp_hello_world() { ^ /usr/lib/R/etc/Makeconf:141: recipe for target 'RcppExports.o' failed make: *** [RcppExports.o] Error 1 ERROR: compilation failed for package ‘with.dot’ * removing ‘/tmp/with.dot.Rcheck/with.dot’
#403 is similar but just for function names. We need a similar s/\./_/ here.
s/\./_/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
replace '.' in package name (close RcppCore#500)
b7b0b9c
96167a2
ddd9ebd
83fefe3
Merge pull request #501 from thirdwing/master
7ea2f04
replace '.' in package name (close #500)
No branches or pull requests
As reported by @deepayan (in reference to Modules but breaks in even simpler cases).
Example:
edd@don:/tmp$ R -e 'Rcpp::Rcpp.package.skeleton("with.dot")' edd@don:/tmp$ R CMD build with.dot edd@don:/tmp$ R CMD check with.dot_1.0.tar.gz
which ends in
#403 is similar but just for function names. We need a similar
s/\./_/
here.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: