Updated README.md to mention Redot engine, includes logo

[EthanBoiLol]

No description provided.

[JohnnyThunder2]

Looks good, I'll let the other maintainers comment this change once they've checked it too.

[Salvakiya]

lets change this real quick

[Salvakiya]

These are empty. we should remove them unless they point to something valid.

[EthanBoiLol]

👍

[CCIGAMES]

you might want to make the logo for the readme longer so it looks nice

something like this with a cleaner R symbol/icon, i had to rip it out of the twitter png since theres no available svg/vector of the icon/logo

[Salvakiya]

it would be a good idea to get an SVG version of that logo. The git history should also be more descriptive.

[shasaur]

Guys, if you want to look like a serious fork, you should get this merged ASAP. It's literally just some text and a logo, it should not require comments and discussion. There are tons of people visiting this repo to see if you are serious about this, or if you are just playing around.

[Salvakiya]

@shasaur If we merge in changes they will be merged in correctly. Just changing the logo does not a Redot make. We dont have binaries yet anyway.

@kuligs2 Redot is not ready to be used yet anyway. As said before if we are going to maintain a fork we are going to do it correctly.

There is no rush to rebrand the repository. It is better to start off on the right foot to establish something sustainable. There will be many things we want to pull down from Godot and there will be things we contribute back to Godot.

[CCIGAMES]

I wouldn't contribute anything to godot

[finepointcgi]

***** Im not choosing a side just giving an svg version of the logo *******

Heres a logo in svg

Personally id do

[Captain-Wet-Beard]

**Salvakiya ** commented

I feel like there isn't much point doing a fork if the fork is just going to feed work upstream, at that point contributors might as well just be contributing to the upstream directly. If the point is that the Godot project needs to be rebased, why support the Godot project? A total rebase seems a lot more appropriate here.

[Coleisforrobot]

Really we should rewrite the readme. Working on a fork that has a basic readme to be built on.

[EthanBoiLol]

you might want to make the logo for the readme longer so it looks nice something like this with a cleaner R symbol/icon, i had to rip it out of the twitter png since theres no available svg/vector of the icon/logo

👍

[bayu-sw]

How about black and white logo

[RNavega]

Hi, suggesting a different design, drawn with spiros.

PNG

SVG (for Inkscape)

Edit: I forgot to put a license, please consider it Public Domain.

[Captain-Wet-Beard]

Hi, suggesting a different design, drawn with spiros.

Wow, that's really nicely designed. Good job

[Naxdy]

Hi, suggesting a different design, drawn with spiros.

That design is the most beautiful rendition of the letter "R" I've ever seen in my entire life. Good job!

[RNavega]

Wow, thanks guys! 😄

[filipworksdev]

There is a new red robot logo available now. Maybe wait a bit until new files are created with the new branding.

[EthanBoiLol]

Closing this as I'm redoing the entire README file

[apofex]

Closing this as I'm redoing the entire README file

Waiting for results

[kuligs2]

@kuligs2 Redot is not ready to be used yet anyway. As said before if we are going to maintain a fork we are going to do it correctly.

are you bringing the OG devs on this fork? How is it gonna be maintained when the OG devs still clinging on to the godot and commit on the original repo? Merging with the original and then branding as "better fork"?