feat: improve UI/UX of playground #17
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve a significant restructuring of the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/components/Playground.tsx(7 hunks)src/components/ui/section-header.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/ui/tabs.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
src/components/ui/tabs.tsx
[error] 63-73: Provide an explicit type prop for the button element.
The default type of a button is submit, which causes the submission of a form when placed inside a form element. This is likely not the behaviour that you want inside a React application.
Allowed button types are: submit, button or reset
(lint/a11y/useButtonType)
🔇 Additional comments (18)
src/components/ui/section-header.tsx (1)
5-14: Verify consistent usage across the playground.
Let's ensure this component is being used consistently across the playground tabs for a unified experience.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try different commands to verify the component usage.
SectionHeader component is consistently used across form sections
The component is being used consistently throughout the Playground component to create section headers for different form sections like:
- Payment details
- Branding & product details
- Business information
- Personal contact information
- Address details
Each usage follows the same pattern with a title prop and is followed by appropriate content containers, maintaining a unified experience across the playground.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check usage patterns of SectionHeader component
# Expected: Should be used consistently across playground tabs
# Find all imports of SectionHeader
echo "Checking SectionHeader imports:"
rg "import.*SectionHeader" --type tsx
# Find all usage instances
echo -e "\nChecking SectionHeader usage patterns:"
ast-grep --pattern 'SectionHeader title={$_}'
Length of output: 281
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for SectionHeader imports and usage with broader file patterns
echo "Checking SectionHeader imports:"
rg "import.*SectionHeader"
echo -e "\nChecking SectionHeader usage patterns:"
rg "<SectionHeader" -A 1
# Also check for files containing SectionHeader to ensure we don't miss anything
echo -e "\nFiles containing SectionHeader:"
rg "SectionHeader" --files-with-matches
Length of output: 1842
src/components/ui/tabs.tsx (2)
1-31: LGTM! Well-structured type definitions and context setup.
The TypeScript interfaces are comprehensive and the context setup follows React best practices.
96-98: LGTM! Good component composition pattern.
The component composition follows React best practices, making the API intuitive to use.
src/components/Playground.tsx (15)
23-29: Excellent use of Tabs for organizing the form sections!
The introduction of the Tabs component greatly improves the user experience by logically grouping related fields into distinct sections. This enhances the form's clarity and usability.
63-65: ****
The same simplification can be applied here for buyerInfo.
127-130: Excellent use of the Tabs component for organizing the form!
Breaking down the form into logical sections using tabs greatly enhances the user experience and makes the form more manageable.
131-132: Great addition of the SectionHeader component!
The SectionHeader component helps in visually distinguishing between different logical sections within each tab, further improving the form's readability and structure.
134-153: LGTM!
The seller address field is implemented correctly with proper validations and error handling.
154-185: LGTM!
The currencies field is implemented correctly with proper validations, error handling, and visual feedback of selected currencies.
186-220: LGTM!
The amount and invoice number fields are implemented correctly with proper validations and error handling.
242-243: Excellent use of the SectionHeader component!
The SectionHeader component effectively separates the branding and product details section from the payment details section, enhancing the form's organization and readability.
Line range hint 244-286: LGTM!
The seller info and product info fields are implemented correctly with proper validations and error handling.
301-388: LGTM!
The seller billing info tab is implemented correctly with all the necessary fields for capturing the seller's business and personal information.
389-474: LGTM!
The buyer billing info tab is implemented correctly, mirroring the structure of the seller billing info tab to capture the buyer's business and personal information.
Line range hint 477-509: Excellent addition of the live preview!
Providing a real-time preview of the PaymentWidget based on the form inputs is a great way to provide visual feedback to the user and enhance the overall user experience.
Line range hint 510-551: LGTM!
The integration code section is implemented correctly, providing the user with an easy way to copy the necessary installation command and the generated integration code.
221-241: Verify the necessity of the fee fields.
Consider whether the fee fields are essential for all use cases. If not, you might want to make them optional or conditionally render them based on a configuration.
To verify the usage of fee fields, run the following script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if fee fields are being used in the codebase.
# Test: Search for usage of `feeAddress` and `feeAmount` in the codebase.
# Expect: No results outside of `Playground.tsx`.
rg --type tsx 'feeAddress|feeAmount' --glob '!src/components/Playground.tsx'If the test indicates that the fee fields are not used outside of Playground.tsx, consider making them optional to keep the form concise for the common use case.
60-61: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Minor: Simplify the condition for rendering sellerInfo.
The current condition can be simplified to just check if formValues.sellerInfo is truthy. An empty object is already falsy.
-formValues.sellerInfo &&
- Object.keys(formValues.sellerInfo).length > 0 &&
+formValues.sellerInfo &&Likely invalid or redundant comment.
|
@aimensahnoun please don't forget to implement the payment widget UI updates, specified by the design Figma, in a separate PR. |
aimensahnoun
deleted the
16-improve-the-uiux-of-the-checkout-playground---too-many-input-boxes--confusing-layout
branch
Resolves #16
Screenshots:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation