Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: combine preprocessor with conformer #101

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 25, 2024
Merged

Conversation

jcharkow
Copy link
Collaborator

@jcharkow jcharkow commented Jan 24, 2024

Preprocessor and conformer were requiring many of the same attributes. Instead of passing many of the attributes to one another combined the classes. Preprocessor methods are private because they are more complex.

Also move some preprocessor functions to transformations

Description

Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change.

Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

Tested using the GUI

Contents (#101)

Other

  • combine preprocessor with conformer

Preprocessor and conformer were requiring many of the same attributes.
Instead of passing many of the attributes to one another combined the
classes. Preprocessor methods are private because they are more complex.

Also move some preprocessor functions to transformations
@jcharkow jcharkow requested a review from singjc January 24, 2024 20:37
Copy link
Collaborator

@singjc singjc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. Makes sense to just merge the preprocessing into peak picking.

@jcharkow
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@irahorecka do you know why this is failing on mac?

@irahorecka
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi - is this still an issue? What's breaking?

@singjc
Copy link
Collaborator

singjc commented Jan 25, 2024

I don't think it's an issue now, just had to re-run the test

@jcharkow
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hi - is this still an issue? What's breaking?

sorry yes it was failing before but now it is good

@jcharkow jcharkow merged commit aa27f47 into dev Jan 25, 2024
10 checks passed
@irahorecka irahorecka deleted the patch/conformer branch January 25, 2024 17:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants