-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 71
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Spec version 2.0 #217
Add Spec version 2.0 #217
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please squash and merge
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I only checked the green bits and have one suggestion. I expect that users will want to know exactly which versions are backward-compatible and which aren't. If something isn't compatible, it should be listed in the table below the sentence. If you're not sure yourself about the extent of backward-compatibility, don't mention it at all. Please get rid of the "might" - it just confuses the reader.
@@ -308,13 +308,14 @@ All changes are documented below. | |||
|
|||
### Compatibility Matrix | |||
|
|||
Unless otherwise noted in the table below, the UI5 Tooling modules are backward compatible in the means that for example UI5 CLI v2.0 will still be able to handle a project that is using Specification Version `1.0`. | |||
Unless otherwise noted in the table below, the UI5 Tooling modules are backward compatible in the means that for example UI5 CLI v3.0.0 might still be able to handle a project that is using Specification Version `1.0`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd suggest to modify this sentence as follows:
"Unless otherwise noted in the table below, the UI5 Tooling modules are backward compatible."
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, we'll change it to match your proposal in a separate Pull Request 👍
No description provided.