Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: updated dockerfile and revived docker functionality #304

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 17, 2024

Conversation

Bhavya-55
Copy link
Contributor

@Bhavya-55 Bhavya-55 commented May 12, 2024

Related Issue

fixes #297

Description

reduced size and also updated dockerfile and revived functionality.
There is missing API key when trying to collect page data for the /api/send once that configure this dockerfile will run absolutely fine . pls if anyone into backend check that

Screenshots

Summary by CodeRabbit

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Enhanced application performance and startup time by optimizing the Dockerfile with a new base image, updated file copying commands, modified dependency installation commands, adjusted build command, and refined container start command.

Copy link

vercel bot commented May 12, 2024

@Bhavya-55 is attempting to deploy a commit to the Sanchit Bajaj's projects Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 12, 2024

Walkthrough

The Dockerfile has been updated to improve performance and efficiency. Changes include switching to a lighter base image (node:alpine), optimizing file copying and dependency installation commands, updating the build process, and refining the startup command for the container. These modifications aim to streamline operations and reduce the container's footprint.

Changes

Files Change Summary
Dockerfile Switched to node:alpine, optimized file copying, updated dependency and build commands, refined startup command.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Reduce Dockerfile size to improve build time

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the title needs formatting Title of issue or pull request does not match the guidelines label May 12, 2024
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great job, @Bhavya-55! 🎉 Thank you for submitting your pull request. Your contribution is valuable and we appreciate your efforts to improve our project. Keep being the part of the community!

'We will promptly review your changes and offer feedback. Keep up the excellent work!
Kindly remember to check our Contributing Guidelines'

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between baecfd7 and 61f0658.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • Dockerfile (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
Dockerfile (4)

1-1: Switch to node:alpine base image to reduce container size.


3-8: Ensure all necessary configuration files are copied correctly.


11-11: Switch from npm install to yarn install for dependency management.


16-16: Switch from npm run build to yarn build to align with the use of Yarn.

Dockerfile Outdated
# Command to run on container start
CMD ["yarn", "dev"]
CMD ["yarn","dev"]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip

Codebase Verification

Using yarn dev in the Dockerfile, which executes next dev, is inappropriate for production environments as it starts the server in development mode. This mode is not optimized for performance and security, which are critical in production. It is recommended to use yarn start for production environments, which runs the server in production mode.

  • Change the Dockerfile command from CMD ["yarn","dev"] to CMD ["yarn","start"] to align with production requirements.
Analysis chain

Using yarn dev as the startup command. Ensure this aligns with production requirements, as dev typically starts a development server.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if `yarn dev` is appropriate for production or if it should be `yarn start`.

# Test: Search for yarn scripts definitions in package.json. Expect: `dev` script suitable for development only.
cat package.json | jq '.scripts.dev'

Length of output: 47

@Sanchitbajaj02
Copy link
Owner

There is missing API key when trying to collect page data for the /api/send once that configure this dockerfile will run absolutely fine . pls if anyone into backend check that

Can you tell me where I can provide the Resend api key in this dockerfile from the .env assuming when someone pull this image, he/she has that?

Also few things to do:

  • AI code review has suggested some changes please do that
  • Update the branch with master to merge it

@Sanchitbajaj02 Sanchitbajaj02 changed the title updated dockerfile and revived docker functionality feat: updated dockerfile and revived docker functionality May 12, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the title needs formatting Title of issue or pull request does not match the guidelines label May 12, 2024
@Sanchitbajaj02 Sanchitbajaj02 added 🪲 bug Something isn't working 🛠 goal: fix The label is related to fixing a bug MEDIUM Difficulty Level: Medium level2 25 points gssoc GSSOC'24 Required Label and removed wait for reviewers labels May 12, 2024

# Install app dependencies
COPY ["package.json", "yarn.lock*", "./"]
#RUN npm install
RUN yarn install
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How would yarn be installed into the image?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Sanchitbajaj02 yarn can be installed like npm. Both are packages . Yarn is faster that why I did yarn install

Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How does image be created from source of app? I think there might be a script for it.
(Note: I don't know docker much so I am mentioning this from my theoretical knowledge of it)

@Sanchitbajaj02
Copy link
Owner

Hi @Bhavya-55
If you didn't respond in next 24hrs, I will close this repo

@Bhavyaa55
Copy link

@Sanchitbajaj02 I will make the relevant changes and all that needs to be done by today. By the end of day I will raise pr .

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 61f0658 and 0f18fdd.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • Dockerfile (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • Dockerfile

@Sanchitbajaj02
Copy link
Owner

Hi @Bhavya-55
why are we first copying the config files and then copying entire file again . . ?

@Bhavyaa55
Copy link

@Sanchitbajaj02 We copy the specific configuration files and package.json first to ensure they are cached by Docker's layer caching mechanism. It is structured in a such a way to minimize redundant files

Copy link
Owner

@Sanchitbajaj02 Sanchitbajaj02 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

Update the PR with latest changes to get it merged

@Bhavyaa55
Copy link

LGTM.

Update the PR with latest changes to get it merged

Thanks for reviewing changes but pr is already updated , what needs to be done further let me know . I have already pushed the recent changes ..

@Sanchitbajaj02 Sanchitbajaj02 merged commit bf2ff2b into Sanchitbajaj02:master May 17, 2024
2 of 3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🪲 bug Something isn't working 🛠 goal: fix The label is related to fixing a bug gssoc GSSOC'24 Required Label level2 25 points MEDIUM Difficulty Level: Medium
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: Dockerfile size is too large
3 participants