[java][bidi]: add getData, addDataCollector and removeDataCollector commands

[navin772]

User description

🔗 Related Issues

💥 What does this PR do?

Adds getData, addDataCollector and removeDataCollector commands as in BiDi spec:

1. w3c.github.io/webdriver-bidi#command-network-addDataCollector
2. w3c.github.io/webdriver-bidi#command-network-getData
3. w3c.github.io/webdriver-bidi#command-network-removeDataCollector

🔧 Implementation Notes

💡 Additional Considerations

🔄 Types of changes

• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality and tests!)

---

PR Type

Enhancement

---

Description

• Add BiDi network data collection commands per W3C spec

• Implement addDataCollector, removeDataCollector, and getData methods

• Create parameter classes for data collection configuration

• Add comprehensive test coverage for all new functionality

---

Diagram Walkthrough

flowchart LR
  A["Network Module"] --> B["addDataCollector"]
  A --> C["removeDataCollector"]
  A --> D["getData"]
  B --> E["AddDataCollectorParameters"]
  D --> F["GetDataParameters"]
  D --> G["BytesValue"]
  E --> H["DataType enum"]
  F --> H

Loading

File Walkthrough

	Relevant files
Enhancement	Network.java Add network data collection methods                                            java/src/org/openqa/selenium/bidi/module/Network.java Add three new methods: addDataCollector, removeDataCollector, getData Import new parameter classes and JSON handling utilities Implement result mapping for getData command response +44/-0    AddDataCollectorParameters.java Create AddDataCollectorParameters class                                    java/src/org/openqa/selenium/bidi/network/AddDataCollectorParameters.java New parameter class for addDataCollector command Support for data types, max size, collector type, contexts Builder pattern with fluent API and validation +78/-0    DataType.java Add DataType enum                                                                                java/src/org/openqa/selenium/bidi/network/DataType.java New enum defining supported data types Currently supports RESPONSE data type +33/-0    GetDataParameters.java Create GetDataParameters class                                                      java/src/org/openqa/selenium/bidi/network/GetDataParameters.java New parameter class for getData command Support for data type, request ID, collector, disown flag Builder pattern with validation +59/-0
Tests	NetworkCommandsTest.java Add data collection command tests                                                java/test/org/openqa/selenium/bidi/network/NetworkCommandsTest.java Add comprehensive tests for all new data collection methods Test various parameter combinations and edge cases Verify error handling for invalid scenarios +157/-0

---

[qodo-merge-pro]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

🎫 Ticket compliance analysis 🔶 5678 - Partially compliant Compliant requirements: Non-compliant requirements: Investigate and resolve ChromeDriver "ConnectFailure" on repeated instantiation. Reproduce and address environment-specific issue. Provide fix or guidance for the error scenario. Requires further human verification: Validation on the specified OS/Chrome/ChromeDriver/Selenium versions in a real environment. Confirmation that the error no longer appears across multiple driver instantiations. 1234 - Partially compliant Compliant requirements: Non-compliant requirements: Ensure click() triggers href JavaScript in Firefox as in 2.47.1. Requires further human verification: Manual/browser testing across Firefox versions to confirm behavior.

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪

🧪 PR contains tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Result Mapping The getData result mapping uses a manual Map read and a second JsonInput to parse BytesValue. Verify schema stability and that "bytes" is always present; consider direct parsing or null-safety to avoid NPE if backend omits "bytes". private final Function<JsonInput, BytesValue> getDataResultMapper = jsonInput -> { Map<String, Object> result = jsonInput.read(Map.class); @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") Map<String, Object> bytesMap = (Map<String, Object>) result.get("bytes"); try (StringReader reader = new StringReader(JSON.toJson(bytesMap)); JsonInput bytesInput = JSON.newInput(reader)) { return BytesValue.fromJson(bytesInput); } }; Validation Only maxEncodedDataSize is validated; allow-empty checks for dataTypes and collectorType values are minimal. Consider enforcing non-empty dataTypes and validating collectorType against supported values to prevent server errors. public AddDataCollectorParameters(List<DataType> dataTypes, long maxEncodedDataSize) { Require.nonNull("Data types", dataTypes); if (maxEncodedDataSize <= 0) { throw new IllegalArgumentException("Max encoded data size must be positive"); } dataTypes.forEach(dataType -> this.dataTypes.add(dataType.toString())); this.maxEncodedDataSize = maxEncodedDataSize; } public AddDataCollectorParameters collectorType(String collectorType) { this.collectorType = Require.nonNull("Collector type", collectorType); return this; } Defaults/Flags The "disown" flag is always included (defaults false). Confirm server tolerates explicit false; if optional, consider omitting when false. Also ensure request and collector IDs format are validated upstream. public Map<String, Object> toMap() { Map<String, Object> map = new HashMap<>(); map.put("dataType", dataType.toString()); map.put("request", request); if (collector != null) { map.put("collector", collector); } map.put("disown", disown); return Map.copyOf(map); }

[qodo-merge-pro]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

Category	Suggestion	Impact
High-level	Simplify the JSON parsing logic The JSON parsing for the getData command in Network.java is inefficient due to a redundant serialize-deserialize cycle. Refactor this to process the nested JSON map directly. Examples: java/src/org/openqa/selenium/bidi/module/Network.java [72-82] private final Function<JsonInput, BytesValue> getDataResultMapper = jsonInput -> { Map<String, Object> result = jsonInput.read(Map.class); @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") Map<String, Object> bytesMap = (Map<String, Object>) result.get("bytes"); try (StringReader reader = new StringReader(JSON.toJson(bytesMap)); JsonInput bytesInput = JSON.newInput(reader)) { return BytesValue.fromJson(bytesInput); } ... (clipped 1 lines) Solution Walkthrough: Before: private final Function<JsonInput, BytesValue> getDataResultMapper = jsonInput -> { Map<String, Object> result = jsonInput.read(Map.class); Map<String, Object> bytesMap = (Map<String, Object>) result.get("bytes"); try (StringReader reader = new StringReader(JSON.toJson(bytesMap)); JsonInput bytesInput = JSON.newInput(reader)) { return BytesValue.fromJson(bytesInput); } }; After: private final Function<JsonInput, BytesValue> getDataResultMapper = jsonInput -> { jsonInput.beginObject(); while (jsonInput.hasNext()) { if ("bytes".equals(jsonInput.nextName())) { return BytesValue.fromJson(jsonInput); } else { jsonInput.skipValue(); } } jsonInput.endObject(); // Or throw an exception if "bytes" is not found return null; }; Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 __ Why: The suggestion correctly identifies an inefficient JSON processing pattern and proposes a valid simplification, which improves performance and code clarity.	Medium
Possible issue	Validate against an empty list In the AddDataCollectorParameters constructor, add a validation check to ensure the dataTypes list is not empty, as required by the BiDi specification. java/src/org/openqa/selenium/bidi/network/AddDataCollectorParameters.java [34-42] public AddDataCollectorParameters(List<DataType> dataTypes, long maxEncodedDataSize) { Require.nonNull("Data types", dataTypes); + Require.nonNull("Max encoded data size", maxEncodedDataSize); + if (dataTypes.isEmpty()) { + throw new IllegalArgumentException("Data types list must not be empty"); + } if (maxEncodedDataSize <= 0) { throw new IllegalArgumentException("Max encoded data size must be positive"); } dataTypes.forEach(dataType -> this.dataTypes.add(dataType.toString())); this.maxEncodedDataSize = maxEncodedDataSize; } Apply / Chat Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 __ Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a missing validation for an empty dataTypes list, which improves API robustness by enforcing a contract from the BiDi specification.	Medium
General	✅ Improve performance by avoiding re-serialization Suggestion Impact: The commit replaced Map-based parsing and re-serialization with streaming parsing using JsonInput.beginObject/hasNext/nextName/skipValue and directly invoked BytesValue.fromJson, eliminating JSON re-serialization and removing Json/StringReader usage. code diff: @@ -71,14 +67,18 @@ private final Function<JsonInput, BytesValue> getDataResultMapper = jsonInput -> { - Map<String, Object> result = jsonInput.read(Map.class); - @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") - Map<String, Object> bytesMap = (Map<String, Object>) result.get("bytes"); - - try (StringReader reader = new StringReader(JSON.toJson(bytesMap)); - JsonInput bytesInput = JSON.newInput(reader)) { - return BytesValue.fromJson(bytesInput); + jsonInput.beginObject(); + BytesValue bytes = null; + while (jsonInput.hasNext()) { + String name = jsonInput.nextName(); + if ("bytes".equals(name)) { + bytes = BytesValue.fromJson(jsonInput); + } else { + jsonInput.skipValue(); + } } + jsonInput.endObject(); + return bytes; }; Refactor getDataResultMapper to use the JsonInput streaming API, avoiding inefficient intermediate object creation and JSON re-serialization when parsing the response. java/src/org/openqa/selenium/bidi/module/Network.java [72-82] private final Function<JsonInput, BytesValue> getDataResultMapper = jsonInput -> { - Map<String, Object> result = jsonInput.read(Map.class); - @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") - Map<String, Object> bytesMap = (Map<String, Object>) result.get("bytes"); - - try (StringReader reader = new StringReader(JSON.toJson(bytesMap)); - JsonInput bytesInput = JSON.newInput(reader)) { - return BytesValue.fromJson(bytesInput); + BytesValue bytesValue = null; + jsonInput.beginObject(); + while (jsonInput.hasNext()) { + if ("bytes".equals(jsonInput.nextName())) { + bytesValue = BytesValue.fromJson(jsonInput); + } else { + jsonInput.skipValue(); + } } + jsonInput.endObject(); + return bytesValue; }; [Suggestion processed] Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 __ Why: The suggestion correctly identifies an inefficient JSON parsing pattern and proposes a more performant, streaming-based approach which improves code quality and efficiency.	Low
Update