Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 18, 2023. It is now read-only.

Conversation

felix2feng
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Mar 21, 2019

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 5179

  • 8 of 8 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 100.0%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 5155: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 998
Relevant Lines: 998

💛 - Coveralls

for (uint256 i = 0; i < baseSetComponents.length; i++) {
uint256 withdrawQuantity = vaultInstance.getOwnerBalance(baseSetComponents[i], address(this));

baseSetWithdrawQuantities[i] = withdrawQuantity;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Check for zeros here?

private
{
address[] memory baseSetComponents = ISetToken(_setAddress).getComponents();
for (uint256 i = 0; i < baseSetComponents.length; i++) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do we do individual transfers here when we batch them in the ExchangeIssuanceModule contract?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nvm we don't have a batch transfer functionality

@felix2feng felix2feng merged commit 85a357c into master Mar 21, 2019
@felix2feng felix2feng deleted the felix/handle-redeem-component-vault branch March 21, 2019 17:25
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants