Skip to content

修复格式问题 #185

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 5, 2019
Merged

修复格式问题 #185

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion Java相关/这几道Java集合框架面试题几乎必问.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
- **3. 插入和删除是否受元素位置的影响：** ① **ArrayList 采用数组存储，所以插入和删除元素的时间复杂度受元素位置的影响。** 比如：执行`add(E e) `方法的时候， ArrayList 会默认在将指定的元素追加到此列表的末尾，这种情况时间复杂度就是O(1)。但是如果要在指定位置 i 插入和删除元素的话（`add(int index, E element) `）时间复杂度就为 O(n-i)。因为在进行上述操作的时候集合中第 i 和第 i 个元素之后的(n-i)个元素都要执行向后位/向前移一位的操作。 ② **LinkedList 采用链表存储，所以插入，删除元素时间复杂度不受元素位置的影响，都是近似 O（1）而数组为近似 O（n）。**
- **4. 是否支持快速随机访问：** LinkedList 不支持高效的随机元素访问，而 ArrayList 支持。快速随机访问就是通过元素的序号快速获取元素对象(对应于`get(int index) `方法)。
- **5. 内存空间占用：** ArrayList的空 间浪费主要体现在在list列表的结尾会预留一定的容量空间，而LinkedList的空间花费则体现在它的每一个元素都需要消耗比ArrayList更多的空间（因为要存放直接后继和直接前驱以及数据）。
-**6.补充内容:RandomAccess接口**
- **6.补充内容:RandomAccess接口**

```java
public interface RandomAccess {
Expand Down