Add model.biblLike to model.entryPart.top

[ttasovac]

In our ongoing work on TEI Lex-0, we've discovered that <bibl> was not allowed as a child of <entry>. This was preventing us from encoding bibliographic references that are offered in some lexical resources (especially the historical, etymological and dialectological dictionaries). See below a screenshot from the Dictionary of Old Dutch.

We have implemented this change in TEI Lex-0 by adding model.bibl to model.entryPart.top, but we think this change would be useful for TEI in general.

[xlhrld]

Another example with <bibl> on entry scope is Lokotsch (1927):

247. Ar. barḳūḳ:
     [Aus dem lat. praecocium ‛das Frühreife’ über gr. πραικόκκιον, πραικόκια, πρεκόκκια, βέρικοκκα, s. Lammens Fārūḳ S. 364 Anm.; das ar. Wort hat übrigens die Bedeutung ‛Pflaume’ erhalten, während die Aprikose mišmaš (s. hier Nr. 1471) heißt]; hieraus sp. albaricoque, albercoque, pg. albricoque, alboquorque, prov. aubricot, frz. abricot, it. albicocco, albercocco, siz. varcoccu; engl. apricot, ndl. abrikoos, dtsch. Aprikose, schwed. aprikos; russ. abrikos, čech. aprikoza. — Ferner infolge Betonung der ersten Silbe mit romanischem Suffix sp. albérchigo, it. albergese ‛Art Pfirsich oder Aprikose’ [dagegen DEFREMERY in JAs (1869) I, 531, wohl ohne Grund]. [Dozy Oost 1—4. DE 67/68. Hobson-Jobson 33. Devic DEt 2/3. ML 6712. Kluge 20.

The last part [Dozy Oost 1—4. DE 67/68. Hobson-Jobson 33. Devic DEt 2/3. ML 6712. Kluge 20. is related to the whole entry which is denoted by the missing closing bracket. Inline references in this dictionary come with paired brackets.

[scstanley7]

This seems reasonable. One question before we implement: Do you want <bibl> added by itself? Or would you prefer having model.biblPart or model.biblLike? Each of these will have consequences (i.e. adding biblLike will allow elements like <msDesc> and <biblStruct> and biblPart will add <citedRange> and <edition> as direct children). Just let me know which option would be best for your use case.

[laurentromary]

that was obviously model.biblLike: we don't want to clutter dictionary entries with elementary objects, but do want to be able to put in all kinds of bibliographical descriptions.

[scstanley7]

Thank you for the clarification.