Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

#2179, item 2: #2196

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 8, 2021
Merged

#2179, item 2: #2196

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 8, 2021

Conversation

sydb
Copy link
Member

@sydb sydb commented Oct 13, 2021

Insist that <constraintSpec> elements in mode "add" or "replace" do have a child <constraint>, and those in "delete" do not.

Insist that `<constraintSpec>` of "add" or "replace" do have a child `<constraint>`, and those of "delete" do not.
Copy link
Contributor

@martindholmes martindholmes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing word "have" in this:

"...but does not a 'constraint' child element...."

Also, I think this:

...has a mode= of "delete"...

should either be:

...has @mode="delete"...

or

...has a mode attribute whose value is "delete"...

Other than that, this looks great.

@sydb
Copy link
Member Author

sydb commented Nov 8, 2021

Merging this unreviewed PR myself (in direct opposition to our normal practice) because I am reasonably convinced it will help fix our broken build.

@sydb sydb merged commit 40c5caf into dev Nov 8, 2021
@martinascholger martinascholger added this to the Guidelines 4.4.0 milestone Apr 8, 2022
hcayless pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants