add missing <sch:rule> elements
#2540
Conversation
use namespace prefixes instead of declarations, and some whitespace tweaks
P5/Test/testmeta2010.odd
Outdated
| <elementSpec ident="list" mode="change"> | ||
| <attList> | ||
| <attDef ident="type" mode="change"> | ||
| <constraintSpec mode="add" ident="a1" scheme="schematron"> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
European subgroup wonders why the constraintSpec is within the attList/attDef and not a child of elementSpec
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have answer, but not a good answer.
The difference was that declaring the constraint specification within the attribute definition (as opposed to as a direct child of the element specification) meant that it was fired only for <list> elements that actually had a @type attribute, regardless of that attribute’s value. That has now been duplicated by using a @context of "tei:list/@type".
What I cannot explain is why anyone thought it was import to fire this test only when a <list> has a @type. Seems nonsensical to me. (Maybe the author wanted to test that it indeed only fired when there was a @type?)
|
@sydb and @martinascholger will resolve the conflicts and merge it |
* P5/Exemplars/tei_enrich.odd * P5/Exemplars/tei_simplePrint.odd * P5/Test/testmeta2010.odd * P5/Utilities/TEI-to-tei_customization.xslt
Title says it all.