Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(TreeSelect): 优化checkable时点击非叶子节点选中的问题 #1734

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 23, 2022

Conversation

uyarn
Copy link
Collaborator

@uyarn uyarn commented Nov 23, 2022

🤔 这个 PR 的性质是?

  • 日常 bug 修复
  • 新特性提交
  • 文档改进
  • 演示代码改进
  • 组件样式/交互改进
  • CI/CD 改进
  • 重构
  • 代码风格优化
  • 测试用例
  • 分支合并
  • 其他

🔗 相关 Issue

💡 需求背景和解决方案

📝 更新日志

  • feat(tree-select): 优化checkable时点击非叶子节点也选中的问题

  • 本条 PR 不需要纳入 Changelog

☑️ 请求合并前的自查清单

⚠️ 请自检并全部勾选全部选项⚠️

  • 文档已补充或无须补充
  • 代码演示已提供或无须提供
  • TypeScript 定义已补充或无须补充
  • Changelog 已提供或无须提供

@uyarn uyarn requested a review from carolin913 as a code owner November 23, 2022 03:10
@uyarn uyarn changed the title fix(TreeSelect): fix interaction conflict between expandOnClickNode a… fix(TreeSelect): interaction conflict between expandOnClickNode and checkable Nov 23, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 23, 2022

完成

@uyarn uyarn changed the title fix(TreeSelect): interaction conflict between expandOnClickNode and checkable feat(TreeSelect): 优化checkable时点击非叶子节点也选中的问题 Nov 23, 2022
@uyarn uyarn force-pushed the feat/tree-checkable-interaction branch from ab5d7c4 to a09474f Compare November 23, 2022 03:27
@uyarn uyarn changed the title feat(TreeSelect): 优化checkable时点击非叶子节点也选中的问题 feat(TreeSelect): 优化checkable时点击非叶子节点选中的问题 Nov 23, 2022
@honkinglin honkinglin merged commit f905415 into develop Nov 23, 2022
@honkinglin honkinglin deleted the feat/tree-checkable-interaction branch November 23, 2022 06:39
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Nov 23, 2022
16 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants