-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 89
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
100 candidates having bad experiences with 1.005000_002 #249
Comments
s/0.75/-0.75/ |
Thanks! Uhh... wow! Yes, this is very interesting and useful. I was hoping they'd mostly be the fault of broken Test::* dependencies. |
|
Suggestion/request: Rerun it with our CPAN IDs on it. Make it easy for authors to find their names and problems without having to scan the listing of 100. |
I agree with petdance - the CPAN IDs would be useful. |
URI::Escape::XS appears to be a false positive. I can't get it to fail on 1.5.0a2. |
UNIVERSAL::DOES has been fixed by 78f0c97 |
The following list is compiled from results of the regression testing done on analysis.cpantesters.org. In column 2 there is the R^2 denoting the quality of the finding. The closer it is to 1 the less disturbing influences have been identified, and the more likely it is that the measured effect is relevant. In column 3 there is the Theta, the direction and amplitude of the influence. I've filtered column three for values < 0.75 and column 2 to values > 0.35. Arbitrary decisions. 103 lines seemed more than enough to me and indeed the last items in the list are already lots of influences mixed in.
Hope this is interesting to you.
Oh, and splitting into individual tickets is left as an exercise:)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: